I still don't get why some sellers think it is reasonable to expect buyers to pay their bus fares! I honestly don't. It is not at all selfish for me to say that it isn't my problem, it ISN'T my problem - am I a fecking charity!! Nope.
If you catch a bus into town, do you just go to the post office, or do you wander round the shops a bit, buy a paper, nip into Sainsbury's for a few bits while you're there....well exactly. It isn't a buyer's cost at all!! Likewise, if you are taking 3 items to the post office, I bet you are charging £1.50 x3 on your listings but only paying out £1.50 for the bus fare...am I right? Or have I misunderstood and do you give your buyers a refund if you are 'sharing' the bus journey out?
It is neither a postage cost nor a packaging cost - it is a seller's expense associated with your wish to flog stuff on Ebay and make a few bucks. Any company, including the big ones, will invariably take a hit against profit for excess delivery costs and write it off against tax. You are saying that because you (broad assumption) aren't paying tax on your Ebay earnings, you will profiteer as much as possible and will not accept responsibility for any cost whatsoever.
It is absolutely right and fair to expect buyers to pay full postage and packing, but if you're going to charge me £1.50 extra simply because you don't live near the post office, and that is not made clear in the listing, then I think that could be very deceptive. Do the sellers on here who build this charge in make it clear in the listing?
(I am not having a go btw at anyone specifically, purely a general rant, just interested).