I am having a crap day, so it is quite probable that I am being unreasonable, but I don't think so, but thought I would gage opinion.
I sold a top last week, age 7. Got an email from the buyer yesterday saying that as the top did not fit his 7 yr old I had obviously shrunk it. He was sure it was shrunk, because his stepson has a jacket in the same make in an age 6 which fits.
The top has not been shrunk, it is totally fine and in great condition. It has a zip part way down the front, which I think would be distorted if the top was shrunk.
He wanted a refund, due to shrinkage.
I replied that the top was fine, it hadn't been shrunk, but if he wanted to return it I would refund cost, but not postage.
He has now sent 3 emails today asking me to explain why the top is not bigger than a jacket he already has in the house and demanding again a full refund including postage both ways, because it is my fault again claiming shrinkage.
I have replied saying that as I am not a shop, or cannot see his jacket I have no idea why the sizing differs, but that on receipt of the jumper back I will refund his money, but not postage.
Am I even under any obligation to refund him, if it is a case of item not fitting?