Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Divorce/separation

Here you'll find divorce help and support from other Mners. For legal advice, you may find Advice Now guides useful.

50/50 if other half has never contributed 50% ?

34 replies

longtimecoming2025 · 20/10/2025 11:33

I am the primary carer, and I pay considerably more towards our expenses/mortgage and our children. I pay for holidays, any meals out, etc.

Fed up of arguing constantly and generally not getting along with each other and have become increasingly resentful of the pressure to earn - I imagined we would take up the slack for the other at various times in our lives but it's ALWAYS me taking up the slack. He can be aggressive (not violent to me/children but gets really vile at times but is general low level unfriendly and nitpicks everything, nothing ever done right etc). Been going on for years and am just very very sad and tired at this point - we live in same house but it's just excruciating, we barely speak to each other, go to bed at different times. He regularly says to children he'd like his own room. On holiday when asked by one of our children if we wanted a photo together, he said "no thanks." So it's really just a v unhappy marriage and terrible example. I feel like it's obvious to children I am not happy (one said "do you love him? REALLY?" recently.) I also feel like I deserve more - I don't want to be 'looked after' by OH, but I want to be equal and deserve happiness. Of course I put my children first and if I thought it best for them for us to stay together, I would do so - but I do not think this environment is healthy for ANYONE. They remark that we bicker constantly, tell us to stop it, etc. I wish we could fix it but it has been YEARS - there's always been some 'thing' that I hoped would magically change things - like his going back to work, or getting a better job, or finishing his retraining. But nothing changes.

My OH did not work for 2 years when our first child was born, because he was on minimum wage so he took care of child. We then moved to be nearer to family who helped and then OH could work. Since then OH has worked in low paying jobs but recently retrained so has potential to earn more now - yet even when he does, he contributes less than a third of our monthly outgoings. He was able to retrain because of his low financial contributions - there's no way I could afford to retrain. He should be applying for permanent jobs but is doing short term work and not applying for permanent things.

Child now 17. We have 2 more - 14 and 11. My parents helped us with house purchase (not rich) and renovation projects.

Feel absolutely fed up of living in an unhappy house and would love to be by myself with my children.

Am terrified he will get 50% of essentially my parents money. Is this how it works??? I feel like such an idiot for getting myself into this situation (was so obvious, looking back - married far too young) and don't see how I can extricate myself. (I don't earn lots, though judging by online calculators it looks like UC would give me about the same - if not more - than what OH does each month.)

OP posts:
Loveduppenguin · 20/10/2025 13:28

JadziaD · 20/10/2025 13:26

No nothing at ALL like the OP"s DH? You contributed by being the home person - the children's primary carer, the one keeping on top of things while he was away and working.

I'm not saying that OP's DH isn't goign to be entitled to a decent whack, but it's impossible to compare your contribution and his. You made one. He didn't.

I am the primary earner. And DH absolutely 100% has contributed massively to our children's lives, including being a SAHD for a long time and doing a lot of the fetching/carrying/after school childcare around his work hours. If we were to split, this would absolutely be something that I would have to take into account.

OP's H on the other hand, has done fuck all and barely contributes to his children's lives - he doesn't even seem to like them very much.

Yeah perhaps not entirely the same. I’ve been made to feel like I did him over though to be fair…anyway.

Franpie · 20/10/2025 13:31

longtimecoming2025 · 20/10/2025 12:55

He spent years working away during all weeknights for not v much money, leaving me to do all school runs and weekday childcare. Definitely not something he did in order to be able to parent!

I’m not saying that he has done what he has done to be a better parent, just trying to show you what he may well say if things get messy. Especially if he seeks legal advice.

JadziaD · 20/10/2025 13:32

Loveduppenguin · 20/10/2025 13:28

Yeah perhaps not entirely the same. I’ve been made to feel like I did him over though to be fair…anyway.

Aaah, yes, the classic, "she's taken all my money". We've all seen that one I'm afraid. Good job for not ltting him get away with it though.

Ifi t's any consolation, DH has a friend who got divorced a few years ago. He was a high earner. She had also been a high earner. Then they moved cities and she accepted a lower paying job so they could move with his job. Then he got a new job in another country, so she stopped working completely and they moved with him to this other country. And then he got fired because he was an addict and did all kinds of stupid things.

As he was getting clean, she was also divorcing him. He was very very angry that she wanted half of the marital assets. It was "his" money and "he had worked really hard for it". All his friends were sympathetic. Not DH. He was, at the time, a full time SAHD. And he very firmly pointed out that this woman had first downgraded her job, then given it up completely so they could move all over the world for his job and she was now having to start again so really, "Jack" needed to be grateful and accept that his ex wife and son needed somewhere decent to live! hahaha.

longtimecoming2025 · 20/10/2025 13:36

CrimsonStoat · 20/10/2025 13:26

After all you explained, I'm another who thought it was going to be about the children.

Continuing to subject them to this awful home environment is really less important than how much money you might lose?

It’s only really about losing money in the sense that if we split, I need to provide a home for my children and I’m concerned I just cannot afford that.

(I hear the counter argument 100% though, and that is why I am having these thoughts.)

OP posts:
JadziaD · 20/10/2025 13:41

I think that in your case, it's clearly unfair if it's 50:50 or close to it. But I think these rules/laws are in place becuase in the majority of cases, they DO work out more or less fairly. And the reality is that traditionally, if the man has earne the money and the woman has done the child rearing, she needs protection.

Definitely find a good lawyer and see what your options are and what you can negotiate with him.

Soontobe60 · 20/10/2025 13:52

longtimecoming2025 · 20/10/2025 12:18

We are married, yes - for 18 years. And based in England. He is not lower earner now other than he is on short term contracts - he could earn more than me. He may be

So why isn’t he contributing the same as you?

Bambamhoohoo · 20/10/2025 14:00

I recently had legal advice for a very similar situation.

yes you will likely lose out. It’s a shocker, but think about it like this- take the hit now whilst you have earning power or stay married for another 20 years?

the couple should leave a long marriage in broadly similar situations - taking into about both partner’s abilities to raise a mortgage and house themselves.

it is very likely to be at least 50:50, but sounds like you may lose more to “set him up” in some kind of semblance of his previous life (which could just be a 2 bed flat)

jeaux90 · 20/10/2025 14:29

OP the first consideration is always housing needs. You both need a property and if it’s 50/50 in terms of parental responsibility then you both need homes that will accommodate that. That may well mean a 50/50 split in assets. Get this divorce started. It sounds horrific for the DC. Get some legal advice, start mediation and understand that the courts will look at the DC needs in terms of housing. Then it will be about income needs. Can you both sustain the houses and kids with what is coming in. It’s irrelevant who gave what or did what.

ToKittyornottoKitty · 20/10/2025 19:01

longtimecoming2025 · 20/10/2025 13:36

It’s only really about losing money in the sense that if we split, I need to provide a home for my children and I’m concerned I just cannot afford that.

(I hear the counter argument 100% though, and that is why I am having these thoughts.)

You can afford to provide a home, even if you have to rent, it’s better than keeping your kids in this situation. The money is important but it’s not a deal breaker in a situation like this

New posts on this thread. Refresh page