Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Divorce/separation

Here you'll find divorce help and support from other Mners. For legal advice, you may find Advice Now guides useful.

What % would I be entitled to after a short marriage?

94 replies

Llush · 09/08/2025 16:20

I have been married for under 2 years but was in a relationship the 2 years prior, so 3.5 years altogether.

I have 2 children, aged 6 & 8, but no joint children. I am a full time stay at home mother and am dependent on his salary. His family pay the school fees.

We live in his house, but it's is held in family trust.

OP posts:
Glowingup · 09/08/2025 17:08

Teddlesisagoodboy · 09/08/2025 17:04

How long do you have to be married to be entitled to something then? I thought once you were married that was the rules

It is - people are very wrong and ill informed on here. There is no time limit for entitlement to a financial settlement and there are many instances of very generous awards to spouses in short marriages.

Llush · 09/08/2025 17:09

MounjaroBingo · 09/08/2025 17:00

Exactly my thought. CF in the extreme!

I was looking after him, doing the housework, making sure he had everthing.

OP posts:
Runningismyhappyplace50 · 09/08/2025 17:09

I would assume nothing but it’s an unusual situation with the grandparents paying school fees and it being a short marriage. Whose idea was it to married/want a divorce (not that it really makes much difference).

MrsTerryPratchett · 09/08/2025 17:10

Llush · 09/08/2025 16:49

It was set up by his grandfather. Mine aren't the only stepchildren to benefit like this.

And when other people with step-kids break up, does the trust keep paying the fees? I can’t imagine why.

You’ve asked what is a legal question. Morally though, why would you think you have a right to take things you didn’t earn? Most SAHM/married people are talking about joint children where the mum is taking a hit do the dad supports everyone. In this case you’ve been supplied free housing, free schooling, free everything, for your children. And now you want what? Some of his house? Alimony? No.

Unless he’s abusive, then maybe morally it’s a little bit different.

DaisyChain505 · 09/08/2025 17:10

They’re not his kids, and you moved into his families home that’s in a trust.

You’re probably walking away with nothing.

You’ve been extremely lucky to be able to remain a stay at home mum and have your children’s school fees paid for by a man who isn’t the father of these kids.

You’re not owed anything here morally, Time for you to get back to work.

Vintagenow · 09/08/2025 17:10

Llush · 09/08/2025 17:09

I was looking after him, doing the housework, making sure he had everthing.

🤣🤣🤣. What? Like his packed lunch! You should probably start looking for a job.

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 09/08/2025 17:13

Llush · 09/08/2025 17:09

I was looking after him, doing the housework, making sure he had everthing.

OK, but he paid for you and your dc's living costs for the same period. You definitely got the better end of the bargain, I'm pretty sure he could have employed a PT cook/housekeeper for less than the cost of supporting 3 extra people and paying 2 sets of private school fees!

ThejoyofNC · 09/08/2025 17:16

Llush · 09/08/2025 17:09

I was looking after him, doing the housework, making sure he had everthing.

And you think you deserve to be paid back for all of that? You've had more than enough compensation already. Poor man.

LazySunbedDays · 09/08/2025 17:17

Llush · 09/08/2025 17:09

I was looking after him, doing the housework, making sure he had everthing.

And in return he paid all your bills, your children’s school fees and presumably kept you in quite a nice standard of living.
Time to stand on your own feet again just as

you did 3.5 years ago, this isn’t a long relationship let alone marriage 🙄

Glowingup · 09/08/2025 17:17

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 09/08/2025 17:13

OK, but he paid for you and your dc's living costs for the same period. You definitely got the better end of the bargain, I'm pretty sure he could have employed a PT cook/housekeeper for less than the cost of supporting 3 extra people and paying 2 sets of private school fees!

That’s not how the family court reasons. There is no discrimination between breadwinners and homemakers.
Any matrimonial property is likely to be shared.
The court will consider the parties’ needs.
The first consideration is the welfare of any minor children of the family. Children of the family include step children who have lived with the couple.

Horseytwinkletoes321 · 09/08/2025 17:17

Married for less than 2 years and you are asking what % you'll receive wowzers! What did you bring to the marriage in terms of assets? I'd expect whatever you brought to the marriage to be safe and the same for your husband. I'm not sure why you think you'd be entitled to his assets? Chosing not to work when you have school aged children from a previous marriage is a choice, it's not up to the man you've been married to for 20min to continue to fund your lifestyle.

Snorlaxo · 09/08/2025 17:18

If the wealth is held by the grandparents then surely it’s not up for grabs in a divorce?

If he’s desperate for you to move out because there’s someone else or something then you’re in a stronger position than if it’s mutual or you want to leave quickly. Work out the minimum that you want (school fees, moving costs maybe car and deposit plus 6 months rent?) and start looking for work plus putting in an application for state school once you secure a new address.

Ballardz · 09/08/2025 17:19

At 6 and 8 you’re not a stay at home mum. You’re unemployed. So taking care of the house is the least you should be doing. That doesn’t entitle you to school fees for his step children for the rest of their lives or rights to the house.

CFery at its finest.

MounjaroBingo · 09/08/2025 17:19

Llush · 09/08/2025 17:09

I was looking after him, doing the housework, making sure he had everthing.

Hmm
MrsTerryPratchett · 09/08/2025 17:20

Glowingup · 09/08/2025 17:17

That’s not how the family court reasons. There is no discrimination between breadwinners and homemakers.
Any matrimonial property is likely to be shared.
The court will consider the parties’ needs.
The first consideration is the welfare of any minor children of the family. Children of the family include step children who have lived with the couple.

There isn’t any matrimonial property because the house is in a family trust. Do you think a Court will award alimony? Because I don’t.

WhenInRomeDoAsTheRomansDo · 09/08/2025 17:21

Llush · 09/08/2025 17:09

I was looking after him, doing the housework, making sure he had everthing.

None of these are legally relevant I'm afraid.

Start looking for a job as soon as possible so you have something to fall back on and start looking for a house.

If his family is wealthy enough to setup trust funds they will have funds for legal representation. They sound like they're not inexperienced in getting legal support so you'll need to get your own lawyer that you'll need to pay for.

OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 09/08/2025 17:21

Llush · 09/08/2025 17:09

I was looking after him, doing the housework, making sure he had everthing.

This is not even a thing 🤣🤣🤣

Actually hope the DM picks this one up, so his family are aware and get all their ducks in a row (if they haven’t already)

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 09/08/2025 17:21

Glowingup · 09/08/2025 17:17

That’s not how the family court reasons. There is no discrimination between breadwinners and homemakers.
Any matrimonial property is likely to be shared.
The court will consider the parties’ needs.
The first consideration is the welfare of any minor children of the family. Children of the family include step children who have lived with the couple.

It might not be how a court would reason, but morally, the OP is entitled to nothing in my view.

And tbh, I would be very surprised if a court found that there was a financial responsibility towards stepchildren after such a short marriage. If that is the case, I think the law needs to change...otherwise it might as well be a gold diggers charter.

BeaLola · 09/08/2025 17:23

I'm interested in what you received from your first DH or 2nd DH or DPartners plus why you are divorcing ?

Minnie798 · 09/08/2025 17:24

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 09/08/2025 17:21

It might not be how a court would reason, but morally, the OP is entitled to nothing in my view.

And tbh, I would be very surprised if a court found that there was a financial responsibility towards stepchildren after such a short marriage. If that is the case, I think the law needs to change...otherwise it might as well be a gold diggers charter.

I agree.
Tbh it sounds like the grandparents have retained control of the wealth. The house in trust, they are paying the school fees. Extremely sensible of them based on this thread.

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 09/08/2025 17:26

Minnie798 · 09/08/2025 17:24

I agree.
Tbh it sounds like the grandparents have retained control of the wealth. The house in trust, they are paying the school fees. Extremely sensible of them based on this thread.

Maybe they saw the OP coming!Grin

Blondebrownorred · 09/08/2025 17:31

Llush · 09/08/2025 17:09

I was looking after him, doing the housework, making sure he had everthing.

Looking after him how? He's an adult not a child that needs to be looked after.

Glowingup · 09/08/2025 17:36

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 09/08/2025 17:21

It might not be how a court would reason, but morally, the OP is entitled to nothing in my view.

And tbh, I would be very surprised if a court found that there was a financial responsibility towards stepchildren after such a short marriage. If that is the case, I think the law needs to change...otherwise it might as well be a gold diggers charter.

That’s what some law reformers have described it as, yes 😂. But I’m not lying. This is a case from the highest court in this country:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_v_Miller

Obviously it will depend on what the assets actually are but with the mention of trusts and school fees, I get the sense this is a high net worth family and the husband may have considerable wealth even if some of it is tied up in family trusts. OP needs legal advice but generally if you marry someone rich, you will get something even if the marriage was short. Moral or not.

Miller v Miller - Wikipedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_v_Miller

Thedoorisalwaysopen · 09/08/2025 17:42

Come on then - what's the excuse for not working?

Viviennemary · 09/08/2025 17:44

Not very much you will have to get a job. Short marriage and he doesn't own a house.

Swipe left for the next trending thread