Hello,
I'm hoping there is someone here who has legal knowledge on the following.
I have recently split from my partner, who was not only emotionally abusive but also told many lies.
I guess for my own sanity I just want to know the extend of his lies and how long they've gone on for.
One thing that he told me, which I'm dubious about but can't find any information about is the fact that when I met him, he was technically still married however separated and no contact with his ex for the 2 years prior.
He also had a non molestation order against him from said ex.
Now, his reason for still being married was that, he claimed, he was not able to start divorce proceedings. Apparently she was the only party who would be able to initiate the divorce. And he claimed she wasn't initiating because she wanted to continue to wield control over his life.
When I pushed back on this, as I've never heard of that rule and can't find anything online about it, he claimed high and low that he was legally unable to initiate it.
Is there ever any circumstance where this would apply or be a thing, or was this 100% a blatant lie? I have no clue why he wouldn't have wanted to divorce.
Eventually they did get divorced another 2 years later, so after 4 years of no contact. She initiated it online and he agreed to it online.
However I'm still doubting the initial story, there's a lot of holes in his entire account and I just feel so gaslighted by him that I guess it would really help me to know if there could be any truth to this story or not.
If anyone knows about this, I would very much appreciate it.