Hi all
Just looking for some advice on our mediated financial agreement
My brain is telling me it’s all good - we’ve agreed this (with a mediator although they had minimal input!)
I consider the deal ‘fair’
By that I mean I can live on what he’s agreeing to pay me each month and buy a house (with a mortgage!)
He earns £300k
I earn £45k
Kids 11 + 8
Married 25yrs
Marriage broke down cos he had an affair
I’ll get 60% of the cash assets
50% of house (but not sell till youngest finishes primary in 2.5 years)
Pensions split 50:50 (his is 4x mine as I worked part time since youngest born - now full time) but £40k of pension will be offset so I have enough of a deposit to buy a suitable house
He will pay me £4K a month for 10 years
I will have the kids 65% of the time
The £4K includes a list of specific things to be covered where the kids are concerned - this will be reviewed annually
We’re almost at the consent order stage and the mediator has mentioned terms like
global maintenance
spousal maintenance
mesher order
when I google any of these things it keeps saying ‘judges hate them/they’re impossible to get/it’s only for 3 years’
I’ve engaged a solicitor for drafting the order
They said if I’m happy it’s all doable with various ‘undertakings’ to ensure he can’t wriggle out of anything
They don’t seem concerned by anything
But I’m crapping myself that a judge will take one look and say ‘that’s waaaayyyyyy too generous - give her less’
It works for me
It works for him
Surely that’s enough?
Maybe a big ask but I’m looking for peoples real world situations in similar circumstances where someone earns 7x more than the other…..TIA