Our financial situation has been somewhat complicated by my ex losing their (single) parent and now set to inherit. It won’t be a lot but more than enough to cover what they claim to be their needs. They were going for all of the available liquid equity despite being the stronger party, whereas I’ve insisted on splitting all assets 50:50.
Am I safe to assume that his argument for more than 50% (and leaving me knee-deep in debt) has now evaporated due to his financial situation changing?
To be clear, I am not after a share of his inheritance. Our marital assets are 100% down to what I personally brought in to the marriage and he has prolonged the proceedings by arguing for 70% to go to him for made-up reasons (my barrister has called him Machiavellian which is an accurate description). We’ve spent £80k on litigation - I even offered him a £50k lump sum at the outset to motivate him to settle and this was not enough.
Our final hearing has been adjourned twice due to his actions, lies and delays, and is now scheduled for next summer. By this time he may not have received his inheritance due to it being tied up in property, by he will have a reasonable idea of what he is set to receive.