Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Divorce/separation

Here you'll find divorce help and support from other Mners. For legal advice, you may find Advice Now guides useful.

discovery of un declared property after divorce

10 replies

BlackStrayCat · 12/09/2024 14:14

Can I do anything? It would have made a huge difference in outcome of arbitration.

TIA

OP posts:
Yogazmum · 12/09/2024 17:13

If you’re already divorced then I don’t think you can do anything. Did you sort a financial order out prior to the divorce?
It’s FO first then sign off the divorce order as far as I’m aware. Once you’re divorced you can’t go back and claim for anything else.
He lied on Form E then if you did that so I don’t know whether it can be challenged now.
I would go back and seek legal advice.

BlackStrayCat · 12/09/2024 17:15

Thank you @Yogazmum I thought as much.

OP posts:
curious79 · 12/09/2024 17:17

Definitely seek legal advice - he lied on court documents. He’s perjured himself. V serious

HoppityBun · 12/09/2024 17:18

BlackStrayCat · 12/09/2024 17:15

Thank you @Yogazmum I thought as much.

Hang on? Who are you taking legal advice from? Anyone with a legal qualification? Or just someone on MN who has a hunch? If you think the arbitration was based on fraudulent non disclosure you should see a solicitor

BlackStrayCat · 12/09/2024 17:21

I have no confidence in my lawyer (he was legal aid and ignored me saying I thought ex had another property)

I feel a bit defeated tbh.

OP posts:
BlackStrayCat · 12/09/2024 17:23

Maybe I will contact another lawyer, now its all over and I have (a miniscule) amount of money.

Thank you @HoppityBun

OP posts:
Mumof3confused · 12/09/2024 22:45

If he has lied and it would have made a material difference then yes it is possible to reopen the case. What proof do you have that he owned it at the time and hid it? Land registry documents?

What do you know about the equity in the property at the time? If the equity is low, there would be little point arguing over it.

millymollymoomoo · 12/09/2024 22:45

Well it will be costly and its existence might not have changed the settlement depending on whole bunch of factors.

you’ll need to weigh up cost of trying to reopen the settlement ( not guaranteed) and chance of having successful claim
( not guaranteed) with the potential value at the end
if it’s sizeable it might be worth a conversation with a solicitor

LemonTT · 13/09/2024 09:48

A lot depends on the circumstances of the case. In order to fairly determine a split disclosure is a must. But how detailed and extensive that disclosure is can vary and couples have some discretion over that. A decision a judge will respect what you decided in court if he or she is assured that you sought and received independent legal advice and you are not being coerced.

You can make an entirely private decision as a couple on the split as long as you do so knowingly and with advice, even if you ignore the advice. Lawyers will make usually confirm this with you. That includes a decision not to seek clarity on detail on disclosure. From what you are saying the opposite is happened. The lawyer ignored your concern that disclosure wasn’t complete.

If the case went to court and you were both order to disclose your assets and he didn’t then there is potentially a flawed judgement. That can be reopened.

I think your first step is to make a complaint about the advice you received from your lawyer. If it can be established through that complaint that you raised the concern but received bad or inappropriate advice then you have started to pull the thread on reopening the judgement.

I am assuming that you have found evidence of his ownership of the property at the time of the divorce. Is that the case?

Do you know the value of equity he holds in the property? The property itself might be worth a lot but the equity could be small.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread