@Stacy2024
My ex was the applicant, but forgot that placed the burden of proof on themselves. They made many allegations of hidden assets, but never provided evidence. They jumped from one solicitor to another in the hope they would get their own ways
So, three different judges dismissed their applications as unrealistic and awarded costs against. Also, at the final hearing, the judge ruled against my ex and asked the question:
That the applicant has had three cost orders against them, does that not demonstrate the applicant’s demands were unreasonable?
Ex’s solicitor number 4 could not answer.
Ex was charged £10K for the final hearing (in 2016) compared to my £1.5K. So, they ended up worse off compared to the offer made two year’s early.
Was ex badly advised, or did they ignore the advice given and their solicitors took the money? I came to the conclusion it was the later. Their solicitors did not charge her anything until the final hearing as they knew from my Form E that there was significant cash available. So, that lulled the ex into thinking they would not have to pay anything.
So, don’t make assumption that involvement of solicitors will get you a better result as their costs must be taken into account. Likewise, if you are the applicant you will have to provide evidence. The respondent does not have to disprove anything.