Posting on behalf of a friend.
married 20 years.
split 5 years.
started divorce proceedings over a year ago.
3 children with her 21/17/15
1 with someone else (newborn)
He has a very acrimonious relationship with ex. Lots of problems with her neglecting the children (they’ve been in counselling she was investigated at one point) them against him (doesnt work they are too old) it still causes a lot of issues and stress.
she Ran up debt several times during the marriage the last time they had to remortgage to pay it off (35k) not the first time either.
house is neglected she doesn’t look after it.
she has moved new boyfriend in.
kept all his things won’t give him anything.
he pays maintenance so can’t afford a house big enough to house children adequately due to lowish wage.
he wants a clean break as obviously he doesn’t trust her because of debt. Plus all the issues. Seen two solicitors. Last one said the courts will force sale of house so he can have clean break and she would have a higher percentage of equity because of children. Fine.
second one is saying the courts won’t force her, she can do what she likes and if she runs up debt then tough. The mortgage company will come after him.
Anyone know which is more likely. How can 2 solicitors say completely different things? I’ve advised him to get a 3rd opinion as he’s already spent 2-3k on the divorce. She will not comply or be reasonable in any way.