I have posted on this before but am a little confused from what I've read from solicitors' advice pages on new rules form April 23.
I could just about afford to move out into a rental and continue to pay half the mortgage. Am I right that if divorce proceedings have been started, even if it took some time to sell our house, I can still claim principal private residence relief when it sells? I'm going on this advice here.
• Up to three years after ceasing to live together as partners.
• For an unlimited period if the transfer occurs as part of a formal divorce agreement.
If so, does it allow for choosing not to sell the house straight away? I don't want my W to be pressured to sell if I wasn't living there, although I'd have to get my agreed share of equity at some point, ideally within a few years. There are no children, both have adult children from previous relationships, non resident.
To expand on the not wanting to force the sale, is it possible to agree and seal a financial split and/or divorce with a timeline for house sale that extends beyond agreement of financial split/divorce? I don't mean a court agreed Mesher type thing but a mediated mutually agreed decision that is binding?
My reasoning is that if either of us came into more money post financial split/divorce all that is claimable is the agreed share of the house?
It is likely W will inherit some money in a year or so. I don't want to claim any of that and in an ideal world she could then remain in the house and be able to pay me the agreed equity, or we sell at that point and she is able to buy rather than rent which is all she could afford now.
(Her salary £40k mine £58k equity in house £200k value £330. Both age 58. So as you can see, buying impossible as a cheap 1 bed flat in our area is £225k)
Not having to move quickly is what she wants and as we have a dog, renting isn't easy.