Will try and keep this brief.. have written previous posts.
DB left his alcoholic and mentally unstable wife 2 years and now has full time custody of his
2 DC.
Due to the abuse and continued drinking his ex has not been allowed any contact for the last year. In the meantime she has had serious health problems and is currently in a brain injury facility.
Her last solicitor effectively "resigned" due to her drinking but she has now engaged with a new firm.
My niece (DN 12) has been receiving weekly counselling for what she has and is going through. Been going really well and she has a great rapport with her therapist.
Out of the blue DB received a letter from her solicitor demanding to know why DN was having counselling (disclosed as part of court proceedings) who this person is, why and how a referral was made, what their qualifications are and what is being discussed in these sessions!!
We are gobsmacked at the sheer nerve of ex-wife; that she should even wonder why her traumatised DD would need counselling after all she has witnessed and the enforced separation from her mother!!
I said that DB shouldn't respond at all but his solicitor has advised a response would put him
on higher ground.
We are therefore going to draft something today but are conflicted on the tone it should take.
Frankly I would just tell them to fuck off but obviously needs a level of reservation.
Need wording that answers the questions succinctly but points out that it is unbelievable why ex-w would even be asking!! 