Lessons learnt self representing at 14 hearings to divide 4 assets (no children)

[Daisybarker123]

I was the respondent, my ex was the applicant. I will disclose Rules and legislation in force, how these are broken by all, plus ways to protect yourself and 'hopefully' get fair court hearings - sadly my transcripts prove I didn't, but they are now an invaluable source of evidence of procedure/costs/breaches of legislation. I will explore these topic in further threads. I welcome any disclosure of injustice, (supported by documentary evidence) as I hope to start a campaign to claim unfair losses if your right to a fair hearing under the Human Rights Act 1998 was breached.

What were the 4 assets and how were they divided in the end

I do not want to get into specific assets and income. I am taking an overview of the Family court, rules and legislation and exposing how it beaches these rules. The first point I make is the sole purpose of the is to comply with Matrimonial Causes Act - this states basically each party should have their housing, income and pension needs met. My transcripts and lack of income or pension, prove that the court has failed in this, therefore it is not fit for purpose. However, the represented parties needs have been met excessively, at the expense of mine. Also ex's legal team have generated around £100,000, costs having totally controlled the court, denying facts i.e. my evidence. I have heard many accounts of litigants being traumatised and losing assets as a result of court orders and am seeking evidence of this and what if any action was taken against the court. If the court has left litigants without a home, income or a pension, then it served no purpose at all. If it ordered these losses to fund the represented party and/or the legal team then it is failing under legislation.