Presumably this is a non issue?

[BeethovenNinth]

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/12/06/mrna-jabs-modena-pfizer-quarter-unintended-response/

interesting study done. I’m just a bit confused why they need to stop it happening in future if it’s a non issue

thoughts?

It’s totally going to be an issue, but nobody will admit it.

I can't access the article - what does it say?

Click on the link and immediately switch off the data or switch to airplane mode and you can read the article.

im not a scientist but I gather a rogue protein? could be made by your immune response to the covid vaccine which may or may not be an issue - they don’t know. New vaccines don’t do this but it’s exciting anyway going forward. (For the scientist I would add, maybe not so much for the rest of us - my words not those of the journalist ).

I think this is about the same study:

mRNA vaccines may make unintended proteins, but there’s no evidence of harm | Science | AAAS

Rolf Marschalek, a molecular biologist at Goethe University Frankfurt... agrees, that the new work is not a reason to worry about the safety of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. “It’s a much bigger problem that people are underestimating the Omicron variant and are not getting the updated booster,” he says.

@thelastrose ooo looks very similar and much easier to comprehend.

https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/researchers-redesign-future-mrna-therapeutics-to-prevent-potentially-harmful-immune-responses

There were no adverse effects in the 21 study participants.

@BeethovenNinth

Well I’d just look at the responses on his Twitter feed about the article which include :

”more anti-vax reporting from the Torygraph”

”this is an inaccurate summary of the finding”

“Joe Pinkstone - ‘science’ correspondent who ‘scraped a lower 2:2 and has never done any research in his life’

@WhalePolo exciting for the science community - not for the rest of us, just word filler for a newspaper.