That doesn't matter, really. It was only noted as a point of interest.
It couldn't matter more, when your point waa that if you think it's happening where you are, that's relevant to the UK. And you even do it again at the end! The fact that something allegedly happens in one unnamed society doesn't in itself give it the slightest relevance in respect of another.
Although not resident there, I always find constant references to this amusing given that many posters here were doing the exact same thing at the time. But if you can hold up that yardarm forever and say, "what about this?" I'm pleased for you.
Perhaps your amusement stems from your incorrect assessment of the situation. Posters here weren't doing the exact same thing unless you think they were in or working at the heart of government. Do you?
The difficulty that the Tories face is that they were so obviously engaging in one rule for me, one rule for thee. Then lying and bullshitting about it for sustained periods. That behaviour did a number on public trust, which had actually been pretty high earlier on in the pandemic. Johnson has gone now, but those who remain spent months minimising. It isn't an innately pro or anti restrictions argument to acknowledge that these are just not people who have the credibility to take the public with them any more.
You weren't responding to anyone
Yes I was. That's what the part about introducing and reintroducing isolation was about. If you want to say it wasn't clear, that's a fair point, but it isn't actually a matter of opinion that it was a response.
And the fact that it was a response to a point about isolation not just for covid is essential to the explanation of why it was delusional. If you ignore that point, your attempt to refute mine can't do anything other than fail...