@Grumpybutfunny
“Performing risky clinical trials on prisoners and removing their human rights” : I don’t even have words for this. Any developed country worldwide would see this as an abhorrent thought process. It would go against the human rights convention. And you also advocate the death penalty.
Then in the same post you are lauding the Great Barrington Declaration. With the sweeping generalisation of a vulnerable person being ‘an old grandparent’ v’s a child.
The vulnerable amongst us come from all walks of life. They are not just ageing grannies. They have families, friends - they can not be put in a group, segregated and have their rights taken away. Prior to the vaccine - I read an estimate that 20 - 30% were vulnerable to severe illness, and then - how does that impact your ‘fit’ groups when the vulnerable are all taking up bed spaces and resources? I know two thirty year old parents who had no idea they would be ‘vulnerable’ - and were both hospitalised with no one to care for their 2 year old child.
And then you have Long Covid - again I know a teen who contracted Covid during the first wave. It took her a very long time to recover, and she has subsequently had problems with her hearing and balance.
Lockdowns can work well : South Korea, New Zealand. In Italy you have two regions where there was a delayed lockdown v’s a quick lockdown and the resulting difference that made to the death toll.
Sweden relied on voluntary changes of behaviour and they had a compliant population. I don’t think that would have worked in a country that was densely populated or with many families living closely together - or countries with a lack of expertise/bed space/resources or in countries with a high level of distrust in their government.
But I still think the biggest argument is scientific consensus opinion. A correctly implemented lockdown will save lives - and help control the spread of infection until a solution is found (the vaccine).
I’m wary of fringe science - because it’s often infiltrated by ‘scientists’ with thought processes such as - “let’s take away the rights of prisoners and perform risky clinical trials n them” - which is why peer reviewed, consensus opinion IS the basic tenet of science.
If lockdowns don’t work full stop - it will become consensus opinion - and that hasn’t happened. What has happened - is consideration as to how they could/should be better implemented in the future - if we are in the same situation again.