@Awalkintime
BrightYellowDaffodil
At no point did I compare the role or what was in the injections. I compared the frequency which is what the post is about. How often it is given. Nor did I say it was a vaccine. Please read things properly.
Did you mean to be so rude?
The point I was making is that the difference in function for the injections means there's different justification for why the frequency may differ in terms of acceptability. If Depo only works for a certain number of months then it has to be given at that frequency. Covid boosters wane over time, but their efficacy is dependent on a number of factors, as is the risk/benefit analysis.
@MsAgnesDiPesto
’m genuinely curious about you and all the people who say the same. What is it about the scientific evidence and the emergence of new variants which makes you sure that the arbitrary interval of one year is the optimum for a vaccine? Surely it’s linked to when new variants arrive, how dangerous they are, and when the vaccine for them is available? If you believe vaccines are useful in guarding against serious illness, surely you’d take them when public health officials say they’re needed, not at an interval you, as a lay person, deems acceptable?
As far as I'm concerned, the scientists were saying back in November that boosters, by and large, wouldn't be needed. And it should be remembered that there is no such thing as The Science to be followed; there is quite a range of opinions within the scientific community (generally, not just a few extreme outliers) like here: www.thetimes.co.uk/article/6f13ec0e-7b96-11ec-846f-fcbd721f9c02?shareToken=c9ac6b0b39b3e4b25e240d8b6fb70420 .
Yes, then Omicron came along but it's milder. I was happy to have the first two vaccines because it gave a high degree of protection at the time a more dangerous variant was circulating, and which gave a greater level of herd immunity required for the general re-opening of society.
Now, while I do understand that boosters give additional protection, it's a balance of risk and benefit. I've known people have some quite serious side effects from the vaccines and I was pretty ill after my second one. At the moment I don't feel that the benefits of the booster outweigh the risks. I also feel that the booster campaign was a bit of a 'Throw everything at it, just in case' effort, particularly in light of earlier scientific view that boosters wouldn't be necessary.
I have no particular opinion on what the 'right' interval for boosters, if any, should be. In my case I'm leaving it as long as possible in order to try and not have the illness so severely again. I'm also of the view that immune systems are more complex than just antibodies and repeatedly coshing ourselves with another dose of vaccine is like making someone take an exam again and again just to be sure, rather than trusting that they learned the first times around.