Mangosteen The issue is that the response to SARS was driven by science and this response is driven by politics, it’s an insane reaction to getting the Chinese border open, especially if the restrictions, can get the gweilos to take flight, not Covid . There is no scientific basis to a three week isolation period for instance, I am pretty sure nowhere else in the world has done that ?
During SARS we were kept informed at every stage what they were discovering about the virus, where and how it was transmitted (including the delightful details of the transmission by faecal matter to every flat shower room in the Amoy Gardens tower blocks which led to the scaffolding going up on many other tower blocks including our own
) At no point did I, and presumably you, feel that what was being asked of us, including school closures and the return to school restrictions, was unreasonable.
Most people I know had no problem with the restrictions at first. Hong Kong public health officials had listened to Taiwan who spotted Covid on planes from Wuhan in mid December and both they and the residents were well in advance of other countries including China in accepting / bringing in the measures they developed during SARS. We all knew that wasn’t the big one and were prepared for that. If anything people were frustrated with Carrie Lam that she didn’t close the border sooner. For a long time there was a benefit in the zero Covid policy, the economy stayed more open than here and the school my DCs attended certainly went back full time (in masks) when our U.K. schools were still closed, and were certainly far better at online learning than most U.K. schools when they were closed.
The restrictions though have become ever more unhinged and unfair, just as all the other aspects of Carrie Lam’s regime have in response to Beijing.
In a way culling hamsters is a bit of a metaphor for how pathetic and insane she has been in that endeavour…..