[quote hamstersarse]@ollyollyoxenfree
Not sure how you describe it as a "hint" given the sheer volume of research activity and fundings pumped into this area
It is not mentioned as a side effect
And post-hoc studies, imo, really aren't acceptable and is part of the reason there is the cry from the 'anti-vaxxers' that this vaccination is experimental. The mere fact that this has emerged after mass deployment is not something I am particuarly comfortable with[/quote]
It is not mentioned as a side effect
Because it isn't yet clarified to be one. It would be incredibly unethical to list effects not known to be causal on a consent form - doesn't help anyone.
And post-hoc studies, imo, really aren't acceptable
You repeatedly claim there is no research, then cry "this isn't acceptable" when presented with the high quality research you demanded. All side effects were tracked in clinical trials, menstrual side effects were not picked up as a signal.
that this vaccination is experimental. The mere fact that this has emerged after mass deployment is not something I am particuarly comfortable with
Again - I think you're revealing your lack of knowledge. The vaccines are not experimental, this has been explained to you time and time again.
It is not possible to detect rarer side effects in clinical trials simply due to lack of statistical power- this is true for all interventions. It is why we have reporting systems in place and how complications like myo/pericarditis were identified.
It is clear the coronavirus infection has an impact on the menstrual cycle along with many other women's health issues. I have no idea why (like with the other adverse effects you repeatedly post about) you only seem to care about women's health problems when they relate to vaccination, not infection