It is an interesting question why anyone with a medical or scientific background would think it appropriate to announce to the world that omicron is mild when they had only seen 6 cases...
Your average GCSE science student would understand that you can't conclude anything from such a tiny sample size. She is now saying that she has only seen one severe case with COVID induced pneumonia in someone with HIV. How many people with severe COVID or pneumonia are going to make an appointment with a (private) GP instead of going to hospital?
I would assume she has an agenda. She certainly expressed her anger about travel bans to SA because she felt SA was being punished for having a good testing and sequencing programme. She may well be just be enjoying her 15 mins of fame. It could be confirmation bias, she told the world the first few cases that she saw were mild (the first case was one of her patients) so she is looking for evidence that she was right and ignoring evidence that she might not be.
What does the data say? So far, there seems to be slightly fewer hospitalisations and slightly less severe symptoms than in previous waves. That doesn't mean omicron has mutated to less virulent (severe), it is likely that what is being observed could be down to immunity from vaccination or prior infection. It is us who have changed, not the virus.
What does that mean for the UK? It means that it is very difficult to predict what will happen here from what is happening in SA because, although over 90% of the population in the UK have antibodies from infection or vaccination, immunity wanes over time, and there is less data on how many people have antibodies on SA (at least, I can't find anything up to date) to compare with.
It also shows that omicron is far more transmissible (infectious) than previous variants, the number of cases is doubling every couple of days. That is a problem because even if fewer people as a percentage fall seriously ill than with other variants, a small percentage of a large number is still more than the NHS can cope with eg even if the rate of hospitalisations is halved, if you have a large number of cases at the same time, that equals more people in hospital, 10% of 100 cases a day is 10 hospital admissions per day, 5% of 1000 cases a day, is 50 hospital admissions.
There are lots of differences between SA and the UK that will affect transmission and severity of symptoms:
It's summer in SA, reducing transmission
It is flu season in the UK
SA requires masks to be worn in public
Immunity - we are at a point where most people in the UK were vaccinated over 3 months ago so immunity is starting to wane. We need to get a move on with the boosters.
Age profile of the 2 countries
Genetic differences - we know that 15% of Europeans and 60% of South Asians in the UK have a gene that doubles the risk of dying from COVID that is rare in people of black African heritage
We can't really be sure about omicron in SA, it's early days and there is limited data, let alone predict what will happen in the UK. There are enough warning signs that it could cause serious problems and we should act now while we have the chance.
I don't have time for links but there are plenty of links to the data and a range of expert opinions not from a GP who likes the sound of her own voice on all the gazillion threads about omicron.
@AndreaC67 the GP OP is referring to is Dr Angelique Coetzee, who was on Sky today saying the UK's response is hysterical, so presumably the person you saw too. She isn't the equivalent of Chris Whitty, she is just a private GP. She is chair of the South African Medical Association but that is a trade union. I'm sure she is a very credible source when it comes to medical employment issues in SA.