Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Covid

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

Covid Delta variant offshoot ‘less likely’ to cause symptoms

17 replies

Whathefisgoingon · 18/11/2021 09:45

www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/18/covid-delta-variant-offshoot-less-likely-to-cause-symptoms

Sounds like good news to me?

OP posts:
Mindymomo · 18/11/2021 10:36

Lets hope so, more infectious, but less severe, isn’t this the way the scientists say is normal and the way forward.

OliveTree75 · 18/11/2021 12:50

Interesting

SonnetForSpring · 18/11/2021 13:30

It's good news for some but not really good news for those who are higher risk as it means many people will be walking around contagious and infecting these higher risk vulnerable people.

Guacamole001 · 18/11/2021 13:35

Think viruses tend to evolve this way.

HSHorror · 18/11/2021 14:49

As the person on there commented it will be the fact people are vaccinated and most cases are in kids. And then theres that some peolle are picking it up on lft.

Whathefisgoingon · 18/11/2021 16:38

@HSHorror I think they’ve probably accounted for that..

OP posts:
HSHorror · 20/11/2021 15:30

You would think so but then why did the dr (?) say that too

chesirecat99 · 20/11/2021 16:13

@HSHorror

You would think so but then why did the dr (?) say that too
I think he has just been asked for a quote about the press release. He isn't part of the React team who did the study.

He says "the data" doesn't give the groups the infections are in. It isn't clear whether he means the data that has been released doesn't have that information or whether he means that information wasn't collected.

TBH I don't think the sample size was large enough to draw any conclusions (I only read the press release). It says only 814 positive samples were analysed to look at the genetic code, 12% (98) were from the AY.4.2. lineage. Although they could know the vaccination status of participants, there is no way they could be sure whether participants had been infected previously and had immunity. I would guess that a large percentage of those 98 people had been vaccinated so the number of unvaccinated people in that sample would be tiny. The sample sizes would just be too small to determine if the variant was less virulent (produces less serious symptoms) or the vaccine was more effective against the variant.

Lostinacloud · 20/11/2021 17:01

This just sounds ludicrous to me. If you don’t have any symptoms then you are not ill. If you don’t have any symptoms then it’s highly unlikely you can spread a respiratory virus to someone else due to the lack of coughing and sneezing.
Great news if the virus has mutated to be that benign but surely this should mark the end of all this madness and we can get on with our lives?

ollyollyoxenfree · 20/11/2021 17:30

If you don’t have any symptoms then it’s highly unlikely you can spread a respiratory virus to someone else due to the lack of coughing and sneezing.

I know Mike Yeadon has repeatedly tried to propogate this claim @Lostinacloud, but as I said on another thread it's unfortunately not true with such a transmissible virus

but surely this should mark the end of all this madness and we can get on with our lives?
You've been saying this most of the pandemic, no?

SpringRainbow · 20/11/2021 17:48

If this is really true then I can’t see people tolerating further restrictions.

People are barely tolerant restrictions for a variant that can cause symptoms which can sometimes quite severe.

Lostinacloud · 20/11/2021 18:40

Yes I have been saying it for quite some time. I can but hope that common sense will break through at some point.
As for symptomless illness - that used to be called “healthy” Hmm I guess that was pre pandemic though when not every last person was a permanent viral vector!

Whathefisgoingon · 20/11/2021 19:09

@Lostinacloud what are you talking about? You can be HIV positive and have no symptoms at all and obviously still transmit it. Does that mean you’re healthy?

OP posts:
ollyollyoxenfree · 20/11/2021 19:12

@Lostinacloud

Yes I have been saying it for quite some time. I can but hope that common sense will break through at some point. As for symptomless illness - that used to be called “healthy” Hmm I guess that was pre pandemic though when not every last person was a permanent viral vector!
And typhoid, HPV, chlamyidia...

Asymptomatic tranmission is not something made up in 2020 no matter how vehemently posters seem to think it is

Lostinacloud · 20/11/2021 19:21

But we’re talking about a respiratory virus - you know, those viruses that need to spread via droplets and particles.

Even if it passes from person to person undetected, who cares if it doesn’t make you ill!

The fact this virus is so survivable and there is a vaccine for the vulnerable should be enough to bring it to an end but when news breaks that the virus has evolved so as not to cause people to be ill then I can’t understand anyone who thinks we need to carry on under all these restrictions and threats like vaccine passports and mandatory vaccines. Some posters here clearly enjoy it all too much!

ollyollyoxenfree · 20/11/2021 19:45

@Lostinacloud

But we’re talking about a respiratory virus - you know, those viruses that need to spread via droplets and particles. Even if it passes from person to person undetected, who cares if it doesn’t make you ill!

The fact this virus is so survivable and there is a vaccine for the vulnerable should be enough to bring it to an end but when news breaks that the virus has evolved so as not to cause people to be ill then I can’t understand anyone who thinks we need to carry on under all these restrictions and threats like vaccine passports and mandatory vaccines. Some posters here clearly enjoy it all too much!

But we’re talking about a respiratory virus - you know, those viruses that need to spread via droplets and particles. As has been explained to you many many times, asymptomatic transmission commomly occurs with coronavirus @Lostinacloud

Even if it passes from person to person undetected, who cares if it doesn’t make you ill!
Uhuh, except this is only true if it doesn't make a significant proportion of the population seriously ill. You are wildly extrapolating from one media headline to assume that no-one now gets ill from coronavirus. If you read the original research findings you would see that isn't the case. As has been said many times, you may not personally be at risk from COVID but you're not immune to needing hospital care for other health emergencies. If hospitals are saturated with COVID cases, anyone needing non-COVID treatment will suffer.

When we end up with a dominant highly transmissible variant that only makes a tiny proportion of the population significantly ill, then yes, that would mean suppression measures could be dropped/minimised, with maybe some extra precautions being needed for peak times. This is exactly the situation we are heading towards (i.e., coronavirus being treated more like 'flu) but we are not there yet.

You've seen a single headline and decided (not for the first time) that this means the pandemic is over and anyone advising caution is hysterical.

Whathefisgoingon · 20/11/2021 19:45

@Lostinacloud I mean, it’s not a definitive article, is it?

I am sure if it is ever the case that it “doesn’t make anybody ill” then that is exactly what would happen.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page