@Lostinacloud
But we’re talking about a respiratory virus - you know, those viruses that need to spread via droplets and particles.
Even if it passes from person to person undetected, who cares if it doesn’t make you ill!
The fact this virus is so survivable and there is a vaccine for the vulnerable should be enough to bring it to an end but when news breaks that the virus has evolved so as not to cause people to be ill then I can’t understand anyone who thinks we need to carry on under all these restrictions and threats like vaccine passports and mandatory vaccines. Some posters here clearly enjoy it all too much!
But we’re talking about a respiratory virus - you know, those viruses that need to spread via droplets and particles.
As has been explained to you many many times, asymptomatic transmission commomly occurs with coronavirus
@Lostinacloud
Even if it passes from person to person undetected, who cares if it doesn’t make you ill!
Uhuh, except this is only true if it doesn't make a significant proportion of the population seriously ill. You are wildly extrapolating from one media headline to assume that no-one now gets ill from coronavirus. If you read the original research findings you would see that isn't the case. As has been said many times, you may not personally be at risk from COVID but you're not immune to needing hospital care for other health emergencies. If hospitals are saturated with COVID cases, anyone needing non-COVID treatment will suffer.
When we end up with a dominant highly transmissible variant that only makes a tiny proportion of the population significantly ill, then yes, that would mean suppression measures could be dropped/minimised, with maybe some extra precautions being needed for peak times. This is exactly the situation we are heading towards (i.e., coronavirus being treated more like 'flu) but we are not there yet.
You've seen a single headline and decided (not for the first time) that this means the pandemic is over and anyone advising caution is hysterical.