@LizzieMacQueen
It would be great for classrooms full of kids. They all spit then their collective spit is tested and if +ve they all go for a PCR.
DHs work is trialling something like this! He calls it "spit in a bucket" testing, but really everyone gets their own pot to spit in

A sample is taken from each pot at the end of the day, mixed with other people's samples, and run through a pcr. If it's positive, the samples are split into 2, and some more spit from each pot tested - the negative half discarded and the positive half resampled and so on, so eventually you get the single sample or samples that are positive without testing everyone individually.
Pros are that it's cheaper than running them all through a PCR individually as you don't need to test a negative "batch" of samples. Cons are someone has to deal with an awful lot of spit which will take more time than the more, um, liquid samples produced via the swab, and you also need to produce quite a lot of spit in the first place.
What I don't understand, though, is if spit works in a PCR, why it can't be used routinely. So you spit in the vial of liquid you get with the swab, or put the swab in the vial after dabbing it in a blob of spit you produced earlier. May not be as good as a swab at picking up virus (they are very insistent you don't touch any other part of your mouth with the swab in the process, so a spit test couldn't be so sensitive!) but it has to be better than nothing?!
Sorry, that's a lot of times I've written "spit" there 