Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Covid

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

16 year olds getting vaccinated already?

55 replies

PuffingPansy · 02/06/2021 21:22

Many of DD's 16 & 17 yo friends are now receiving invitations for, and getting their vaccinations here in London. I knew that vaccines had been medically licensed for under 18s but I didn't realise the government had authorised them actually being given out to minors. Is this happening anywhere else yet? - I can't find anything about it online - and if not, why is it happening here?

OP posts:
Chailatteplease · 15/06/2021 21:20

I won’t be vaccinating mine, who will be 12 at the end of the year. I’ve had both and been ill each time, second one side effects have lasted almost 2 months. Although I don’t regret it for myself, I wouldn’t put a child who’s extremely unlikely to suffer from severe COVID through it.

OnTheBrink1 · 16/06/2021 00:02

@BeingATwatItsABingThing

I think that vaccinating perfectly healthy children who are highly unlikely to suffer from covid, for the benefit of adults, is unethical.

Many vaccines are given for the protection of others as well as the child. It’s to protect those that can’t have the vaccine for any number of reasons: too young, adverse reactions, etc. Herd immunity benefits all.

Even if there is a very small chance my child will suffer if she gets covid, I would happily have her vaccinated because any risk is too much risk of her suffering when that can be easily prevented. It’s also to protect her younger sister because she’s only a baby. DH and I will be vaccinated even though there is very low risk to us in the same way that we followed lockdown rules even though covid was unlikely to be fatal for us. We are not that selfish.

If Any risk is too much risk, what about the risk of long term adverse reactions to the vaccine?
SophieGiroux · 16/06/2021 00:08

I don't think any under 18's should be having this jab unless they have underlying health conditions. Agree that it's totally unethical, the risk/benefit ratio does not add up.

speckledostrichegg · 16/06/2021 01:06

the risk/benefit ratio does not add up.

I would argue a risk/benefit ratio always adds up

...sorry Grin

yearoflostyouth · 16/06/2021 08:35

It's not mandatory so if you are against vaccinating your child you don't have to, but please don't prevent other parents getting their children vaccinated.

My DC was vaccinated as CV/CEV ages ago.

The government now think they are more expert than the MHRA. They want to evaluate the risks.

What do the government think the MHRA do?

The government are spreading fear by talking about these risks. The MHRA has already assessed the risks and approved the Pfizer vaccine in over 12's.

Not vaccinating children (optionally) will impact negatively on the education of every child in this country.

Not to mention transmission... but people like to see a personal benefit from vaccination. If you want to keep class isolations and school shutdowns continue while the rest of the country is living freely, then rally against vaccinating children. If you would like your children to receive a more certain and consistent education then support what the MHRA has already deemed safe and effective - vaccinating over 12s.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page