I'm really surprised at some of the responses.
We have to ask: what differentiates this pandemic from others?
Absolutely, in terms of the current, most restrictive, limits for individuals and society, we will return to, not normal but (annoying term, I know!) a new normal which incorporates most of what we are used to.
But more widely, the pandemic was absolutely expected by epidemiologists, in this form. It arose from the ability of this virus to transfer from an animal to humans. Most likely bats, perhaps via another animal host (pangolin has been suggested). It happened, not because this is in any way new, but because the management of our planet is having very serious consequences: population growth means much more chances for close contact between infected animals & large groupings of people (eg the wet markets in China, which are huge) and our decisions re: deforestation & removal of natural habitats, particularly in Asia, of species like bats, meaning they come to live in much closer proximity to humans.
Bats are important, as they have such strong immune systems apparently, that viruses that survive in them, are very potent.
In terms of normality, we need to want that to look different. In a local, more medium-term sense, it means accepting some restrictions for a longer period, as we won't be Covid-free, and the likelihood is vaccines need to be repeated in less than a year (tho later developed vaccines will give closer to a year's immunity).
But in a longer-term, we have to address sustainable population growth, destruction of habitats, and the way we live our lives - ultimately the demands we put on the planet. We shouldn't want to go back to normal in that respect.
BBC Seriously did a great programme on this 'The Jump'. www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p099fd8q