Whilst I agree people shouldn't have to isolate if a PCR shows negative after an lft positive...
The problem (in terms of not being in pandemic hell for the next year or more) is the false negatives. Listening to the radio today they were saying people are getting negative LFTs and having parties, then having covid outbreaks.
The BMJ says that LFTs are ONLY useful if the false negative issue is well understood, which it's not. My daughter's friend told her she 'definitely doesn't have covid' because she'd done a negative lft. Given this is a 10 year old testing herself I'm the opposite of reassured by this statement. Apparently she was hugging everyone in school today saying 'it's fine, I definitely don't have covid'.
www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n238
This study done by Birmingham Uni showed that lateral flow tests detected 2 positives in a school testing but missed 60 (detected through PCR). Only finding 2 out of 62 positives is rubbish and possibly (if the 60 who were positive but were falsely reassured by the negatives and stopped social distancing / mask wearing etc) could make outbreaks of covid significantly worse.
www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4941
There have also been studies showing that false negatives are lower when HCPs do the testing but much higher when others (i.e. parents, students) do it.
I think this could be a massive misstep and could result in an explosion in covid infections if they don't explain that a negative doesn't mean you are 100% definitely covid free and can kiss and hug your friends - which seems to be what some people think.