@Delatron
Well I would argue it’s a pretty useful comparison. Especially given Florida’s older population. They should have fared much worse...
It adds weight to the argument definitely.
@Delatron, as I said in my last couple of replies,
The California versus Florida comparison really doesn't allow you to say lockdown restrictions aren't effective at reducing deaths. The populations are not comparable and there's many unmeasured factors at play- ethnicity, SES, healthcare provisions, population density just to name a few.
This is cherry-picking a restrictive state that’s done worse than other restrictive states, and choosing a permissive state that’s fared better than other permissive states to try and prove a point.This comparison isn’t accidental, it's a deliberate choice of outliers that favor a point of view.
For example, you're ignoring Vermont and Hawaii, which have some of the lowest per capita case rates in the US (2,341 and 1,912 per 100,000, respectively) and among the most restrictive policies.
Equally this doesn't prove that heavy restrictions are better than light restrictions, it's just to highlight the point that we don't have a deep enough of an understanding at this point in time.