@IrmaFayLear
Same here. I particularly felt down reading the “vaccine choice” thread.
I too am f*d if I get covid and worried now that I will have to cower in the house forevermore.
That's why I stuck around so long trying to debunk/diffuse all the poor science and daft opinions that were being flung around willy nilly!
The truth is ALWAYS that each version of any medication has pros and cons and with new ones noting can be taken for granted.
There is good data that all of the vaccines currently licensed protect against covid enough for Big Pharma to consider them worth the time and expense of manufacturing, licensing and administering them!
They are being cleared for global use by the organisations that have always cleared all medicines.
As more data is collated all of those vaccines can be tweaked. They think the new technology of Pfizer and Moderna are easier to tweak, faster to get nto manufacture.
There are many advantages to the new type of vaccine. But that doesn't make the older technology useless. It just means that in future, when there is more time, we have a nice new form of vacccine to explore.
In short: No matter what the statistics, the AZ vaccine is perfectly effective against the Kent variant, the dominant variant in the UK, and will be tweaked to meet needs of the SA variant as and when needed.
Gaps between jabs? We have the 'uausl' gap that has become standard for trial and now new data that a longer gap might be more efficaceous, in all of them
Boosters? Who knows? All of the vaccines may need them
Mix and match? Who knows. Currently being studied
That's about it. The rest is all in the logistics: which is easiest to move around; which the UK has on order; speed of manufacturing and transport; in the long run you can add cost effectiveness
All else is not worth thinking about as most of us don't have enough knowledge to understand the raw research data