I think thr governmenr is trying to scare people into complying with lock down. Clearly many are not.
I’m not sure saying it may be more deadly was wise though, particularly as the who also did a conference and said they don’t think it is. Three deaths more in men over sixty, in a group of a thousand they think is more likely to be due to the make up of the group and their health conditions. You simply can’t get the exact same amount of people dying in each group of one thousand because there are so many factors that impact in each group.
The scientists involved were shocked rhe government announced what rhey did. And it scared a lot of people. Who heard it as it “is” more deadly and not what was actually said.
From what I can gather, the government are worried as the vaccine program is rolled out, people will stop complying with lock down, going and seeing granny for example.
The stat announced last night was available a few weeks ago, as I read the report on it, it was like theee weeks ago or something. So I was also really surprised when I heard it had been announced,
The one I read had the exact same numbers, ten v thirteen, men over sixty, groups of one thousand, and the scientists stated it was evidence it was not more deadly as you’d expect that sort of shift. Just like they’d not think it was less deadly if seven died instead of ten, becayse the health conditions of the thousand men infected has a huge impact
So for example if in the second group. Three more men, had cancer, or a heart condition, or diabetes, than in thr firsr group, you’d expect three more to die.