@JesusInTheCabbageVan
So this thread started out specifically as 'Are you not worried
for your children'. Then, when lots of people explained why this was silly, the goalposts shifted to 'Are you not worried your children may infect you'.
Which is a completely different question.
Well yes and no.
The discussions around this often focus on the direct risk to children which appears to be small (as far as we know, we obviously don't know potential long term risks yet).
A lot of us are really worried about the return of schools, but about the indirect risks, which could be really severe for children as losing a parent/s while you are still at school is shit for your education.
Also, I would prefer covid to be well managed by the government for the sake of the children whose lives will be greatly impacted by living in a society with a dysfunctional health service etc.
But if you take the stance that it's best to keep your kids home to protect them from losing a parent, you'd need to fully lock yourself down too, to be consistent.
Not a reasonable comparison at all, if you are a CEV parent with lung damage in a pandemic with a new pathogen that specifically targets the lungs. In that situation you would want to avoid the pathogen.
There are a lot of families who were shielding, we do not want our children to permanently lose their school places, neither do we want to get ill/die before we can be vaccinated.