Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Covid

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

Has the new variant evolved as a response to social distancing?

19 replies

SwanShaped · 23/12/2020 14:54

Does anyone know if this is the case? I’m sure I read it ages ago (but can’t remember where) that this is what would happen?

OP posts:
festivetimes · 23/12/2020 14:56

Interesting hypothesis!

SwanShaped · 23/12/2020 14:57

It kind of makes sense, I think.

OP posts:
Cornettoninja · 23/12/2020 14:58

In a way, possibly. It’s not as deliberate as ‘in response’ to anything though, it’s just simple evolution and survival of the fittest.

TheoriginalLEM · 23/12/2020 15:01

No, its a random mutation. As evil as this virus is (i have it just now, its no fun ) it is just a virus and has no evil mission other than to replicate itself. If it was intelligent we'd be fucked

MrsTerryPratchett · 23/12/2020 15:01

That's not how evolution works.

Viruses have the chance to mutate every time they replicate (same as humans do). Any non-useful mutations will wane, any useful ones (being more catching) will multiply.

This works in our favour sometimes since viruses that are less lethal and have a longer incubation period are 'better'. The transmissibility is good for the virus only, unfortunately.

MillieEpple · 23/12/2020 15:02

I can see if the only people mixing without masks and social distancing are children it would favour mutations that made it pass round children easier.

IamAporcupine · 23/12/2020 15:03

It would make sense in a way, but as cornettoninja said it would be due to selection, not 'as a response to'. In other words, this new strain already existed

SwanShaped · 23/12/2020 15:04

Ok, I don’t think the virus is intelligent. I mean that it’s randomly mutated and become more contagious. And then the more contagious one will be the one to survive. Because social distancing will kill off the less contagious one.

OP posts:
SwanShaped · 23/12/2020 15:05

That’s what I mean porcupine I got the wording wrong.

OP posts:
MrsTerryPratchett · 23/12/2020 15:09

It looks directed, but isn't. That's why wording is important.

Same as cockroaches evolving to dislike certain foods. The ones not commonly used in bait. It's just that all the cockroaches with a sweet maxillae died.

SwanShaped · 23/12/2020 15:17

Yes, I see how the wording is wrong now. I know how evolution works and that it’s all random mutations. It just makes me wonder what new variants there will be as we try to eradicate it.

OP posts:
MrsTerryPratchett · 23/12/2020 15:22

It's random. Some viruses die out, some become endemic, some mutate and survive.

This one is pretty successful so I doubt it will die out regardless. How it mutates is random though.

SwanShaped · 23/12/2020 15:30

It does indeed seem very successful. What I’ve been wondering is whether it will end up adapting to whatever conditions we throw at it.

OP posts:
psychomath · 23/12/2020 15:39

@SwanShaped

Ok, I don’t think the virus is intelligent. I mean that it’s randomly mutated and become more contagious. And then the more contagious one will be the one to survive. Because social distancing will kill off the less contagious one.
I understand what you meant, but even without social distancing the more contagious variant would still spread faster than the less contagious one. It might take longer to become completely dominant over the less contagious strain (if that happens at all), but all that means is we'd have two strains circulating in large numbers rather than one.
SwanShaped · 23/12/2020 16:28

Yeah I hadn’t thought about it like that. That it would be more contagious anyway regardless of social distancing. I’m just feeling really despondent today and like whatever we try there will always be a mutation that means it survives and spreads.

OP posts:
whatswithtodaytoday · 23/12/2020 16:31

It's very likely the vaccine will work on the variation, so although Covid-19 could become endemic, if everyone is vaccinated it won't be a big concern in future. How often do you hear of people getting measles, for instance?

SwanShaped · 23/12/2020 16:33

Thanks, you’re right about measles. And other viruses I guess. It does sound hopeful about the vaccine. Or that even if it doesn’t it’s pretty quick to make a new one that does work.

OP posts:
lljkk · 23/12/2020 16:51

There are so many people to still infect there's no selective pressure for the virus to evolve in any particular way. It mutated this time because this virus slowly mutates constantly, not because there was pressure on the virus because of what people are doing to avoid getting it.

The genomics people are tracking hundreds or maybe thousands of variants, btw. Most of them aren't remarkable variants.

FairyontopofthetreeBatman · 23/12/2020 16:55

@SwanShaped

Ok, I don’t think the virus is intelligent. I mean that it’s randomly mutated and become more contagious. And then the more contagious one will be the one to survive. Because social distancing will kill off the less contagious one.
The more contagious one will take over purely because it transmits and therefore replicates faster whether social distancing is in place or not.

It’s logical that with no social distancing it would spread even faster, but that would be true of any mutation.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page