I am wondering how the ranges have been decided? Surely it would make sense if they were split:
0-3 years
4-10 years
11-17 years
18 - 21 years
So that the infections in each educational setting could be seen. Why the fudging?
At the press conference the age range used was 10-19 years but Chris Witty said this was weighted mostly in universities. Why are primary school children, secondary students and uni freshers all in the same category?
I think we may be surprised if we knew the number of asymptomatic cases there are in our secondary school teens. I wonder if the govt are going into any sample schools to do a mass testing to check this? I guess they just don't want to know!