Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Covid

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

Lol. Speaking English is now dangerous?

15 replies

elmouno · 17/09/2020 14:10

You did not misread that. This article is trying to say that speaking English puts you more at risk 🤪

www.google.com/amp/s/covid19data.com/2020/09/08/why-speaking-english-may-spread-more-coronavirus-than-other-languages/%3famp

The ridiculousness of this all should start being pretty obvious people!! What language are you going to start learning in case that's the next rULe????? 😂

OP posts:
Funkypolar · 17/09/2020 14:13

Perhaps we should pin our lips together like in Handmaid’s Tale?

RedskyAtnight · 17/09/2020 14:18

We could communicate via mime?

elmouno · 17/09/2020 14:19

@Funkypolar

The current parallels to that show are scary. I feel like there are far more people than I thought who would willingly be an Aunt Lydia.

OP posts:
CountFosco · 17/09/2020 14:34

Spanish and Portuguese have no aspirated consonants, it's not helping South America at the moment Sad.

Redolent · 17/09/2020 14:40

Stop reading junk science.

Fink · 17/09/2020 14:44

It's not new, and it's not serious. Academic linguists were looking at this months ago (I remember news stories from France back in April), but as a joke. The science behind it is real, insofar as different languages will inevitably produce different levels of projection of droplets, but none of the linguists are seriously suggesting doing anything about it. It's a nerdy linguistic in joke. More fool on any mainstream media who take it seriously.

SockYarn · 17/09/2020 14:45

Que bien. Desde ahora voy a hablar solamente en espanol.

Que basura. (what a load of rubbish).

Quarantino · 17/09/2020 14:48

OP, do you realise you've posted an article about an article about a study? Why not just post the link to the study being discussed and then re-summarised?

Quarantino · 17/09/2020 14:49

... which says "Although no statistical differences were found between the two types of languages, we observed that in countries in which the dominant language has aspirated consonants there were more cases of individuals infected by COVID-19 in comparison to countries in which the dominant language does not have aspirated consonants."

No statistical differences.

giantangryrooster · 17/09/2020 14:51

Ha, serves you right 🤣. Have you any idea how difficult the 'th' sound is for foreigners, all that lisping 🤣.

ItsGoingTibiaK · 17/09/2020 15:00

The actual results of the study:

"The independent t-test analysis conducted in R showed no significant differences in cases of inflected individuals between the languages with aspiration (M = 254.9, SD = 159.5) and the languages without aspiration (M = 206, SD = 121.9), [t(18) = 0.73, p > .05]."

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7263261/

Quarantino · 17/09/2020 15:03

Yes, that's what I said!

ItsGoingTibiaK · 17/09/2020 15:06

@Quarantino

Yes, that's what I said!
Yes - sorry. Wrote the post then got distracted for a bit before actually hitting publish!
Funkypolar · 17/09/2020 15:09

In Singapore, it’s forbidden to speak on public transport.

www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/singapore/coronavirus

PinkMacaron · 17/09/2020 15:50

I heard that you're more likely to die if you wear red or blue underpants, and less likely if they're black or ivory. Can anyone confirm?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page