Interested in MN view on something.
For my county, the council have communicated to schools (I haven't seen the communication) that parents should be asked to wear masks outside school gates when queueing (2 metres distance already in the queue).
Schools in turn have communicated to parents, by saying the LA has 'made a decision to request' masks are worn. And, put signs up along the road saying please wear masks.
I asked the school whether this decision had any power, legal or otherwise, and was informed it does not. The word decision sounds like it does (to me) but no, it is a request and despite the signs, entirely down to individual choice.
Most parents are wearing a mask. A few are not. A few are looking at those who do not in a less than positive way (my perception perhaps).
I suppose this isn't an AIBU so much as a question, about where the parameters should be for bodies that do not make laws, to put out messages and signs that sound like rules / laws. Whether those messages / signs seem to be for the public good or not.
And how that is likely to impact citizen behaviour. For example, hostility of those who believe everyone should comply with the message, towards those who do not comply but are breaking no rules / law by taking that approach.
Perhaps I am over thinking this, but.. well, over to MN