@Beccatheboo, in all honesty every single one of the questions you pose has an answer if you have the inclination to take the time to look it up.
This though:
how can we possibly know how many people would have died, unless we have developed god-like powers to ultimately predict others’ fates. How can we predict the reaction of 66 million individual immune systems?
The key is in the wording, the best we have are estimates (not certain fact) which are based on survival rates of known patients. That formula is scaled up to the entire population since we know no one has any immunity to covid because it’s a brand new virus.
Yes they will almost certainly be wrong but by how much and which way no one knows, there’s simply no way to look into a crystal ball. Now imagine yourself in number 10, do you take a gamble that it’s not as bad as predicted or do you react to the worse case scenario?
Earlier on at the beginning of this pandemic I read an interview with the American infectious diseases expert, Dr Fauci. He clearly stated that any successful measures that are taken will look like an overreaction in hindsight. It’s bizarre watching him proven right already. People are quoting recent figures (that are the result of the measures taken) to argue that this proves we’re over reacting without any hint of irony.
Feel free to come up with some projections of your own but don’t minimise the potential of covid using data that reflects a period of measures being implemented.
If you don’t understand why things aren’t being opposed in Parliament have you considered the possibility it’s because no one actually opposes the measures because they believe they’re needed? I mean you might be on to something and maybe there’s a hidden agenda but on the other hand maybe you just don’t grasp the situation and they’re right.