So you're saying we can have schools but absolutely nothing else? For how long?
Well, we could have done it throughout May couldn't we? Asked for volunteer teachers in each school to go back with year groups starting with exam groups in secondary, and year 6 in primary. Part time, 15 at a time, morning or afternoon. Or week on, week off. See how it went over a 2 week period- no increase in infection numbers (or, a tolerable increase), then add more children in from other year groups. See how it went for another 2 weeks, see what happened. Then a few more year groups and another 2 weeks. Straight through half term (with promise of early summer finish or something).
If it was proven to be safe (we hope), then more teachers would be happy to go back, more parents happy to have their children in school. If it worked, then we might have been able to have all children in school part time between beginning of May and mid July. No extras, screw leavers assemblies and all that stuff, just be within your bubbles - maybe not 'your' teacher, but still education. Teachers are 'exposed' to two lots of bubbles, but in a much more distanced way. And to begin with, when testing it out, with the older children who would have been able to follow instructions on distancing etc.
There would have been no issue with volunteer teachers. No matter what a lot of people seem to think, nearly all teachers were in school within days of school closure. My school asked for volunteers for Easter weekend, and every single teacher volunteered. We all put our hands up for going in on the first Monday after closure back in March. If it was done as safely as possible, without the feeling that we were being lied to, or even tricked, we'd have been more likely to do it.
Open pubs and shops etc from mid June onwards. As has just happened. But with children at this point all having had 3 weeks school, and another 3 to go.
If you knew for sure that school was safe, would you take it easy over the summer? Despite pubs etc being open by this point? Probably - if you knew your children could go back to at least 50/50 education in September safely, and possibly 100% schooling safely (because data by that point might have backed that option up), would you be more or less likely to have a 'sensible' summer within some SD guidelines? Who knows. Just one of the unknowns.
For this to have worked we'd have needed a government that didn't lie. It would have had to have been honest about school outbreaks. It's already hiding that information carefully in a table on page 11 of of 32 page report that isn't part of the news.
I suggested this right back in April.