We live in Melbourne, and the state has been slowly raising restrictions. It is very difficult as a high number of cases have been identified in the blocks, and as they are older buildings communal facilities like laundries, rubbish and lifts are poor and represent a risk of spreading Covid. There are also a lot of very vulnerable people with co morbitidities, elderly, refugees, young children who would particularly suffer if they caught it.
The likelihood is there are many more cases in the blocks that are unknown, so a total lockdown to test everyone is required otherwise there may be many more cases, and some very vulnerable people would likely catch it. If the promised provision of $750/1500 per household, 2 weeks rent free, supplies of food and medicine and other essentials, and nurses, mental health, domestic violence and substance abuse support does all materialise I think whilst harsh it’s the right decision for 5 days. Ultimately Victoria got it wrong with the hotels, and it’s positive that they aren’t using dodgy security firms.
The big question is how they will handle the positive cases after the 5 days - as they can’t keep everyone locked down indefinitely.
The longer term economic impact of many cases spreading from this if the state shuts down again would also be very damaging to vulnerable families. And yes, if it comes to it if it happened in my suburb for 5 days as long as essentials were provided I’d comply - because it’s only by containing outbreaks we will get back to something close to normal. But also because as a pregnant person I really don’t want to catch it.