The disease and treatment isn’t different in Germany, the noise is in the numbers. That’s what needs to be looked at, and what witty et all keep saying, they need to look at the reporting differences,
I’d assume that when they put everything under the same parameters the disease will be the same rhe world over, with the differences accounted for by the differences in population type Ie what proportion of the population disproportionately impacted is in a given country v how many in another will impact the fatality rate of those countries. Obese, elderly, etc.
However even if we assume the death rate is between 0.5 and 1 percent maximum which is the number originally thought, then we are still looking at only between 1.5 to 3 million people in the uk have had it. Which would validate this studies findings on infection rates Ie it’s not transmitted as originally thought and it’s not quite as contagious.
For me, it is similar to a new flu virus we simply don’t have a vaccine or treatment for. Flu is highly contagious and has a much higher death rate, hence why we vaccinate. I get the symptoms are different, but really that’s the kind of thing we are looking at at the core. It’s not like we have leprosy or Ebola running through our society.