you say this with the authority of some who has evidence of this. What source are you citing?
The numerous threads here. All the discussions on TV with medical experts pointing out that wearing isn't about not catching it. Its about not spreading it. Yes I believe the majority of the general public think its about it protecting themselves.
I’ll take my 2 decades in aviation, along with all the numerous training courses and annual refreshers in safety, risk management, human behaviour, etc and put it back in the box. I work in an industry where it’s essential we persuade the great ignorant public (as you seem to think they are) to follow our instructions even in the face of immediate adversity. In spite of the fact that most travellers seem to ignore safety briefings, and every evacuation video has at least one person dragging their wheelie bag, you’d be amazed just how many people, when the shit hits the fan, listen to, understand and act on the instructions if they are given with authority.
And yet you can't tell the difference between crisis.
Yes, in imminent danger, people are more likely to follow instruction for short periods.
When there's danger that's not immediate and over a prolonged period, people relax and forget to follow specific instruction.
As I noted, a crer on TV with a mask pulled down to their chin/neck area to be interviewed. They have been trained. They can follow instruction, however over time people become complacent and forget basic instructions.
A poster here admitted to doing it herself.
You Bran assessment does make sense because no one is suggesting we do nothing.