I must say I agree with the notion that it’s disproportionate for the vast majority. The way it’s portrayed it’s as if we will die if we get it. That’s clearly not at all true.
I get the 6 week lock down and hopefully after that most businesses will go back to trading pretty much normally. Any longer though and I fear we’ll slip in to a deep recession.
You can’t even get an emergency dentist appointment for god sake. If they’ve got protective clothes on then what’s the issue.
I was reading a link that a lovely MNer posted and according to the ONS the chances of anyone dying under 40 are 1 in 100,000.
I do agree those in the vulnerable group should stay shielded but not the rest of society.
My ex was dropping off my DC and the handgel was out twice and he was saying how dangerous it was etc and I told him yes to some people but not the likes of us- under 40 fit healthy. I was quite shocked at his OTT reactions.
Of course there will be the exception but that could be argued about anything. Flu for example. I googled how many people flu killed each year, he thought about 1000. It’s 17,000 and that’s of course with a vaccine so the number of deaths would be much higher if not.
My point is with reference to flu is that a lot of die catching it but to the vast majority it’s nothing more than an inconvenience
I agree with the lockdown in the short term but any longer than 6 weeks then imo the fallout that will follow will not be worth it