But what I struggle with about this view is that the death toll doesn't support the theory. Any explanations for this?
Weren't flu deaths up massively from previous season? What if it was covid and we thought it was flu?
@emojisarentwords and @gluteustothemaximus
We can't know what people died of before testing but we do have data from all over the world now. If you look at the daily increase in the number of deaths and positive tests, you can estimate how may people are being infected on average by each infectious person. If the number of deaths has doubled in 24 hours, it is likely the number of people currently infected has doubled. You can extrapolate backwards to find out when the epidemic started.
That is a very oversimplified explanation but if you want to know more, this is a good place to start:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartmental_models_in_epidemiology
We have the genome for the original bat strain and the different strains that have evolved and been identified. If there was a "weaker strain" it would have had to have mutated from the original strain, it wasn't the original strain. Given that the virus seems to mutate slowly, it is likely it would not have appeared for some time (eg late December when strain B appeared).
Also, if there were a weaker strain you would expect to have found it in some of the tests, particularly as so many people think they had it. The only way it could have disappeared would be if it had been outcompeted by a more infectious strain. If lots of people had the "weak strain" and it was widespread, it is unlikely that everywhere it reached has also been reached by the other strains, so you would expect to still find clusters of the "weak strain", in the same way that there are currently areas where there is only strain A, B or C.