Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Covid

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

Would you be willing to take a pay cut to help fight coronavirus?

80 replies

Eyewhisker · 11/04/2020 12:33

The Times today was reporting that 90% of people want the lockdown to continue but the economic cost is at least double what the government originally estimated. A lockdown beyond end April is probably totally unaffordable.

One way to make this work is to impose a one-off ‘NHS levy’ where everyone with an income above a certain minimum level - say £1500 per month, pays 20% of the income above that level as an extra tax for the duration of the lockdown, going back to normal a month afterwards. Benefits and the triple-lock pension increase could be frozen for two years and the winter fuel allowance abolished. Those companies which benefit from the crisis - supermarkets, Amazon could also pay the NHS levy for the extra profits that they have for the lockdown. This will not be enough to pay for the lockdown but could allow the longer lockdown that people seem to want and reduce the debt that we will all have to pay back afterwards.

If you’re in favour of the lockdown, would you be willing to do this?

OP posts:
PerspicaciaTick · 11/04/2020 12:37

I'm working double the hours for no extra money, so my pay has already been cut by 50%. I would need a lot of convincing to carry on working my current hours for any less. As it is, I'm working for less than £4.50 per hour.

NerrSnerr · 11/04/2020 12:38

Not a chance in hell. I am working long hours and putting my own life at risk to fight coronavirus. After all the pay freezes over the last decade I feel I have already paid my way.

Flaxmeadow · 11/04/2020 12:40

Yes i would and I was very low waged to start with

EnglishRain · 11/04/2020 12:40

No I wouldn't. We aren't in a position to take any financial hit right now. I'm at risk of redundancy and due to go on mat leave in less than three months.

twinnywinny14 · 11/04/2020 12:43

In theory I would do but in reality losing any pay would mean losing our home so no

Tinyhumansurvivalist · 11/04/2020 12:43

I'm a single parent with a mortgage and bills to pay. I am already a low earner despite working full time. I work in a key industry and am currently working a lot of unpaid hours, so no I would not be prepared to pay an additional levy.

Frankly there are enough wealthy people and corporations who have avoided paying walhat they should for decades, perhaps time to make them pay what they owe rather than yet again penalising the poorest

justgivemewine · 11/04/2020 12:43

I expect we will all be taking a pay cut in the form of increased taxes when this is all over anyway.

chipsandgin · 11/04/2020 12:45

Or the government could make Google/Amazon and other massive tax dodging big businesses pay the tax they should pay & solve the problem instantly instead of targeting individuals?

AlexaShutUp · 11/04/2020 12:45

Well, I could take a pay cut, I suppose, but it would be tight, as I already took a massive pay cut after being made redundant earlier this year. I'd have to stop the voluntary payments that I have been making to a number of self employed people (e.g. dd's dance teacher) to help them stay afloat during this time, and I'd have to stop all of the charitable donations that I'm still making. So whatever extra I put into the pot would probably just come out in other ways.

Eyewhisker · 11/04/2020 12:46

NHS and key workers (supermarket staff etc) could be exempted.

We will all be taking paycuts to pay for this lockdown in the future. I’d rather have my income reduce for a temporary period than for my kids schools to have yet more cuts. We will all be paying for this no matter what and it is better we start now rather than later.

OP posts:
Eyewhisker · 11/04/2020 12:47

I did say that Amazon etc would pay too and at a high rate, but that is simply not enough. If we want the lockdown, we have to pay for it.

OP posts:
TorysSuckRevokeArticle50 · 11/04/2020 12:51

The company I work for have cut wages by 20% across the board already and we're still all working full time hours. I couldn't take another cut on top of that.

Reastie · 11/04/2020 12:52

I’ve already been given a 20% pay cut by my employer (I’m not furloughed). I’m guessing lots of people will have pay cuts by employers anyway.

Eyewhisker · 11/04/2020 12:54

But it would only apply above an income threshold.

We have to face reality that we will all be taking a paycut to pay for this, it is only a question of when we start and whether we decide that we want our children’s life chances to be reduced rather than our own pay now. It would be temporary and relieve the permanent reduction in their future prospects.

OP posts:
burnoutbabe · 11/04/2020 12:55

Not willing.
But I'd accept tax rises are inevitable to fund this and everyone get a pay cut (well higher paid ones anyway)

FizzyPink · 11/04/2020 12:57

I’m shocked companies are doing what yours are @TorysSuckRevokeArticle50 and I know of quite a few friends in the same position.
I’d certainly have zero loyalty to them as an employer after this is all over

Eyewhisker · 11/04/2020 13:00

I find this astonishing.

Almost everyone wants the lockdown to continue but next to no one is willing to pay for it. Why not if saving lives is so important?

It seems that people are totally blind to the cost of this and the implications for their children’s futures.

OP posts:
Chickydoo · 11/04/2020 13:03

Self employed, so already taken a big hit.

PotteringAlong · 11/04/2020 13:03

Because, whilst people can see the bigger picture, the short term picture of being able to pay your bills and feed your families is actually more important right here, right now.

Flaxmeadow · 11/04/2020 13:04

I find this astonishing

I agree OP. What a selfish society we have become.

Sandybval · 11/04/2020 13:06

I would happily donate my commute costs (which not paying at the moment) to help subsidise others, that would be creeping on for 20%.

TorysSuckRevokeArticle50 · 11/04/2020 13:09

Eyewhisker

Have you been financially impacted already?

Many people on this site have lost jobs, had pay cuts, been furloughed, lost businesses already.

What is clearly being said is that for the people responding, there is no more give in their budgets.

Then look at the companies like Virgin and Easy jet, laid off staff with no pay for extended periods, claimed financial support from the government, sitting on bank accounts that go into the billions.

That's where the money is. Of course it would have to be dragged from them kicking, screaming, clawing and crying so the rest of us who are already trying to figure out if we have one 'something on toast' meal this week or 3 will end up footing the bill and suffering for it.

DustyMaiden · 11/04/2020 13:09

The problem is being furloughed has take 50% already.

Howmanysleepsnow · 11/04/2020 13:09

No. I’ve already lost 3 weeks wages due to isolation. I’m likely to lose at least 2 more as I can’t work until dh is recovered enough to be left alone. I’m an agency nurse on a zero hours contract so 2 weeks SSP for those 5 weeks. DH is furloughed. Our income is down by about 75%. When I’m able to return to work, I’ll need the money to repay debts incurred in this time for bills and food.

B1rdbra1n · 11/04/2020 13:10

The rich people are hoarding all the money
www.businessinsider.com/wealthy-money-offshore-makes-inequality-look-even-worse?r=US&IR=T
they should pay

Swipe left for the next trending thread