@hazelnutlatteplease
maybe we are reading it differently look at the quote below:
|*What they seem to be saying is that after SARS-CoV2 first crossed into humans, the ancestral strain (S) subsequently evolved into another lineage (L). Both of these are now apparently circulating. The newer lineage was initially more prevalent, but is now reducing – the authors speculate that this lineage was more affected by human intervention as a result of it being better at spreading/more pathogenic. The older (S) lineage appear less affected by preventative measures, due, say the authors to it being less virulent and so producing a lower level of more stable infections.
“It’s difficult to confirm studies like this without a direct side by side comparison of pathogenicity/spread in, ideally, an animal model, or at least a greatly extended epidemiological study. The authors themselves admit that their sequencing data regarding the rise/fall of the second lineage is relatively scarce and recommend further investigations.*
this links into the article that we now have
www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/coronavirus-vaccine-mutation-covid-19-latest-a9423301.html
That is is now a relatively stable virus. I always thought that it briefly evolved and then went back to the s type which is more infectious but mild
and yes it has always said
80% of laboratory confirmed patients have had mild to moderate disease, which includes non-pneumonia and pneumonia cases,
But the pneumonia cases will be moderate not mild