Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Covid

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

Home testing kits within days.

59 replies

NotExactlyHappyToHelp · 25/03/2020 14:49

apple.news/AgxDFaDblQVmkOUpmI6C3ag

What do we all think? A hugely positive step is my first thought.

OP posts:
Casino218 · 25/03/2020 14:52

I'm 90% sure I've had it over last 2 weeks. I want to help nurse. I would like to be sure

Quarantino · 25/03/2020 14:59

Testing is the only way to combat this.
Should have been the number one priority at the first sign of it.
I'm trying to be optimistic but these tests sound a little too good to be true. They need to pass testing first. Fingers crossed.

LambriniSocialist · 25/03/2020 15:00

Well, The Independent is just a millennial version of The Sun these days so it might not be the absolute best reliable source... But this would hopefully be a good thing.

However, the antibody test would be the best thing, as this test only works if you actually currently have Covid doesn't it?

Quarantino · 25/03/2020 15:02

Also - be aware
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-51991245

Man in court for circulating fake COVID test kits

A great thing if we can get proper tests but some awful people will take advantage.

Lumene · 25/03/2020 15:02

The antibody test involves pricking a finger and analysing a drop of blood in a device that looks like a pregnancy test. It will tell the person using it is they have, or had, Covid-19 and enable them to act accordingly.

NotExactlyHappyToHelp · 25/03/2020 15:02

Yes testing should have been a number one priority for our NHS workers.

I’ve a friend who’s a A&E Doctor who’s having to self isolate at the moment for what he’s fairly sure is seasonal allergies. If he could test and prove this he could get back to helping people.

I’d be more than happy to buy tests for my family. They need to be providing them free to all frontline essential workers.

OP posts:
SirVixofVixHall · 25/03/2020 15:03

DH is in a volunteer run emergency service, so this will be hugely helpful if he has had it.

Quarantino · 25/03/2020 15:05

Bit more info on the 15-min tests from one of the only other sources I could find
www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/25/uk-coronavirus-mass-home-testing-to-be-made-available-within-days

NotExactlyHappyToHelp · 25/03/2020 15:05

@LambriniSocialist I’ve seen a Guardian article about this too so hopefully it’s not sensationalist and based on fact. Not that I’m saying the Guardian are bastions of rigorous fact checking but the more sources that report the more likely it is to be based in fact.

OP posts:
LambriniSocialist · 25/03/2020 15:05

Thanks Lumene I missed that bit where they said it is the antibody test. Interesting... This would be amazing if it is legit, we are self isolating at the moment 99% sure we have all had it/are recovering but without a test obviously we can't be sure.

defthand · 25/03/2020 15:06

Excellent news if true. I’m a little sketchy on the timeline, though given no one else in the world has a serological test, let alone a home one. And can’t IgM and IgA tests be unreliable?

LambriniSocialist · 25/03/2020 15:07

But I do think that Frontline NHS workers should also get access to them first.

I hope that they aren't 'panic bought' by people who felt slightly rough at Christmas and are convinced they have already had it!

Lweji · 25/03/2020 15:08

I don't know how true these news are, but quick tests are being developed and some just deployed.

My main concern is the use at home. Looking at all the imaginary and self doubting threads about pregnancy tests on MN, not sure the general public is prepared for these tests.

LambriniSocialist · 25/03/2020 15:09

Oh God, could you imagine the 'line eyes please' threads off the back of this? Grin

Joans3rddaughter · 25/03/2020 15:14

Well considering that some people cannot count to 6, I think there will be a considerable number of people incapable of performing the test properly.
6 was the maximum number allowed in the local greengrocers this morning ( witten clearly on a notice at the front door.
The mind boggles

NotExactlyHappyToHelp · 25/03/2020 15:23

At least my DDad will be able to use his famous ‘Well I feel a little prick’ joke Grin.

Not that I’ll be there to hear it but I’m sure he’ll FaceTime me to say it.

OP posts:
Abelino · 25/03/2020 15:24

This sounds brilliant for health/essential workers. But I'm not sure how useful it will be for the general public, in terms of getting people back to their normal lives. Would we have to trust that everybody who stops self-isolating has taken a test first?

Obviously it's a positive thing, I'm just not sure it's a game-changer for the general public (unless I'm missing something, which is possible).

NotExactlyHappyToHelp · 25/03/2020 15:28

@Abelino That’s an excellent point. God knows how we’d be able to monitor it. Think it’s been proven this past week you can’t trust people not to be giant knobs.

OP posts:
TheReelSlimShady · 25/03/2020 15:31

Was just coming on to post about this, so glad it's been picked up already.

And for those doubting, this was from the PHE at the House of Commons Science and Tech committee this morning, it's not random rantings - lots of chatter on Twitter from political journalists to verify.

e.g.

twitter.com/adamfleming/status/1242827523991449606

This really should have been ramped up previously, but glad it's coming about, having an at home kit will make a big difference to allow the population dynamics to be better understood and also get those back into society who we need.

defthand · 25/03/2020 15:31

Apparently these things do exist in China, early days. Some entrepreneur in San Francisco bought some to test a section of the population there. You can see pics of them here:

twitter.com/friedberg/status/1242628898887630848?s=21

azaleanth90 · 25/03/2020 15:32

How will it help? Will it test positive if you've had it? how will you know you aren't still infectious? And if you test negative, presumably that's no use as you could still get it tomorrow?

TheReelSlimShady · 25/03/2020 15:33

I think as well once these become widespread we may need a government education piece similar to the 'wash your hands' notices i.e. what to do and how to interpret it correctly.

Isadora2007 · 25/03/2020 15:41

It would help to let people see if they’d already had it- as the assumption is that we haven't unless we’ve had severe or obvious symptoms but some studies suggest many (up to half) of the population will have had it with no or little symptoms. IF this could be proven then the lockdown wouldn’t have to be so long etc.

Isadora2007 · 25/03/2020 15:42

And people who work on frontline services would know they had had it already so could return to work with less worry. Or no need to isolate, again.

Helenj1977 · 25/03/2020 15:46

I'm not sure how I feel about this.

Test positive, brilliant. Off you go back to work. This then brings the issue of bringing it into the home of others test negative.

Test negative your waiting...

Swipe left for the next trending thread