We only care about people if our government sells them arms?
You asked a similar question on a thread yesterday.
Of course people care just the response is different because the UK government do not support the genocide in Sudan so people don't need to protest. Possibly people are happy with the UK government response to the crisis such as:
The new £113 million aid package, which doubles the UK’s aid commitment to Sudan and the region this year, will assist over 600,000 people in Sudan and 700,000 people in neighbouring countries who have fled the conflict, including Chad and South Sudan.
So the only people who can step in and stop a genocide are people selling arms?
Not sure where you picked up that idea. They are the very people who are indirectly supporting the genocide and if your government is selling arms to a country that is carrying out a genocide I can understand why people would be pretty exercised in protesting against that.
And if there is an arms embargo because of human rights abuses then tbe only people who have authority in the conflict are the people selling the arms being used in the genocide?
You'll have to explain that one to me. Surely an arms embargo is one of many options governments have.