The only possibility of an agreement for two states is for the Palestinian side to accept their bit is their bit and the other bit is not
And wouldn’t it need to be added to this that the Israeli government, and certain Israeli people, would need to accept that “the Israelis’ bit is their bit and the other bit is not”?
This is a transcript of an interview with Daniela Weiss, founder of the Settler Movement I saw on a documentary about the treatment of Palestinian children by the Israeli State/IDF someone posted:
Documentary voice: In the 1970s Daniela Weiss would regularly meet Ariel Sharon, then Minister for agriculture, to plan the settlements so no Palestian State could emerge.
Interviewer: “You and Ariel Sharron were determined there would not be a Palestinian State?”^
D.W. ”With my work with Arial Sharron there was a very clear understanding, very clear planning, of spreading the Jewish communities in the way that there will be no option for a Palestinian state in Judea and Sumeria”.
Documentary.”Despite international condemnation settlement growth is surging”.
Interviewer: “If a Palestian child said to you, “What is the hope for me, for my own future, to have my own state? What would you say to that child?”^
D.W. “This land. Was promised. To the Jews. By God. ….. - and - ALL of it”.
“It’s true that on course of history Arabs came to this area from all over; but the promise of God is MORE important than the changes in history and the political changes.
That’s why you have to put it deep into your mind that you have no chance whatsoever in any point of history - neither you nor any of your offspring to ever have an independent state
or here is an Israeli religious school where a child mentions one day Arabs will be their slaves, and another mentions the destruction of Al Aqsa Mosque that will happen.
Then there are the men like Smotrich and Ben-Givr in the way.
Of course not all Israelis think this way at all, but impediments to a solution are not all down to the unreasonable Palestinians.