Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conception

When's the best time to get pregnant? Use our interactive ovulation calculator to work out when you're most fertile and most likely to conceive.

Is 43 too late ...

33 replies

LAU81 · 05/04/2025 15:34

After meeting a slightly younger man 4 years ago and him expressing he would like a child with me , we have both decided that we shall leave things in the hands of nature ... Currently 43 . I'm just wondering if anyone else has fallen pregnant naturally in their 40s ?
I don't have any children but I have been pregnant in my 30s but chose to not continue the pregnancy as my relationship wasn't right.

OP posts:
DownWhichOfLate · 06/04/2025 18:07

Jaessa · 06/04/2025 17:36

https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/ncardrs-congenital-anomaly-statistics-annual-data/ncardrs-congenital-anomaly-statistics-report-2020/maternal-age

Jumping from 10% under 20 to over 45% chance for over 35 of gene abnormalities in birth is an immense step statistically. OP should be taking informed decisions and not proceeding with a pregnancy based on wishful thinking.

Umm… I’m embarrassed for you.

curliegirlie · 06/04/2025 18:34

Jaessa · 05/04/2025 22:07

Very late in the game, but not impossible. Keep in mind that you'll have immense chances of birthing children with defects such as down syndrome

Down's syndrome is not a "defect". Please be mindful of the language you use.

Is 43 too late ...
Jaessa · 06/04/2025 18:39

curliegirlie · 06/04/2025 18:34

Down's syndrome is not a "defect". Please be mindful of the language you use.

Not being mean, it's medical language. Don't be quick to jump into conclusions.

www.cdc.gov/birth-defects/about/down-syndrome.html

CarrieOnComplaining · 06/04/2025 18:51

Jaessa · 06/04/2025 17:36

https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/ncardrs-congenital-anomaly-statistics-annual-data/ncardrs-congenital-anomaly-statistics-report-2020/maternal-age

Jumping from 10% under 20 to over 45% chance for over 35 of gene abnormalities in birth is an immense step statistically. OP should be taking informed decisions and not proceeding with a pregnancy based on wishful thinking.

Is it your comprehension that is at fault, or your maths? Maybe both.

Read it again. With understanding.

curliegirlie · 06/04/2025 18:54

I'm bloody glad we're better at language and terminology in the UK than the US. "Condition" is fine and acceptable, "defect" just has so many negative connotations.

www.nhs.uk/pregnancy/your-pregnancy-care/screening-tests/

CarrieOnComplaining · 06/04/2025 18:55

Fletchasketch · 06/04/2025 17:28

The chance of Down syndrome is a bit less than 2% so a more than 98% chance of not having Down syndrome. If there was a 2% chance of rain and you said there was an immense chance of rain, people would think you didn’t understand what the word immense meant. There is a higher chance of issues than at 33, granted but the odds are still in your favour.

Good luck, OP!

And Down's, and other chromosomal conditions are easily identified in early pregnancy, should you choose to make any choices in that scenario.

Obviously plenty of so called congenital abnormalities are not identifiable - but many are minor and easily assimilated or mitigated.

LAU81 · 08/04/2025 11:16

Thank you for your replies . Just a couple of factors to clear up .
Firstly , myself and my partner are having a happy life without children.. and could continue to do so. Having a child together if we are lucky enough to conceive would be a bonus . I do not wish to have IVF personally or have a doner or any other ways of having a child.
Hence my term of letting nature decide.

Secondly , I am aware that over a certain age increases risk of downs syndrome, however my view is that a child with downs syndrome is not 'defected ' as someone has implied and myself and my partner would love that child regardless of how they were born . .

I

OP posts:
Bluepiano · 11/04/2025 12:52

DownWhichOfLate · 06/04/2025 16:12

Do you know what “immense” means, as you’ve used it incorrectly here

I also dislike the way they have said Down syndrome is a defect. Imagine if someone with down syndrome read that.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page