Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conception

When's the best time to get pregnant? Use our interactive ovulation calculator to work out when you're most fertile and most likely to conceive.

Genetic disorder + trying to conceive

4 replies

elledrn · 28/05/2021 08:03

My partner (34) and I (31) have been trying for a baby for the last 5 months with no luck.

He had an aortic dissection in March 2020 undergoing 12 hour emergency surgery, followed by 2 additional surgeries and 6 weeks in hospital – 3 of which he spent in a critical condition in ICU. He has thankfully recovered well since and DNA tests have revealed that he has a rare genetic disorder called ACT II (a version of Marfan Syndrome) which caused the dissection. He has also been diagnosed with a second genetic disorder called Polycystic Kidney Disease, causing cysts to grow in the kidneys and which often leads to renal failure (his kidneys are currently working at 40% and the goal is to prolong this as long as possible).

Both genetic diseases are chronic and apparently people have more chance of winning the lottery than having 2 genetic disorders, so he was incredibly unlucky with his genes.

Today we had an appointment with the geneticist to discuss our options for conceiving:

  1. we can conceive naturally but the baby will have a 50% chance of having one of the genetic disorders and a 25% chance of having the two genetic diseases.
  2. IVF where the genes can be isolated but the wait is 3 years

I don’t know what to think. If we go option 1, we can (hopefully) have the embryo tested for either illness after 10 weeks. They need to confirm that they can detect the 2 disorders by doing so so this is TBC. If the baby has a genetic disease(s), we can decide to terminate the pregnancy. No doubt this will be incredibly traumatic but if the baby is diagnosed with ACT II, there is a high chance they too will suffer an aortic dissection. My partner survived it but he is one of the lucky ones, 50% die before even getting to surgery. I feel very strongly that I don’t ever want to go through that again or put a child in that position. The up side is that the child would be on treatment from a very young age and have regular check-ups, something my partner did not have. However and aortic dissection in ACT II patients is completely unpredictable.

Another aspect of conceiving naturally is that it is going to be a struggle too. My partner is on a lot of medication and while this are getting better between us, sex is often difficult. He has difficultly having an erection and low libido which the doctors say is a side effect of the medication. We generally have sex once during the ovulation period, we have not managed twice. I’ve been using ovulation predicting kit to know when I am due to ovulate and I track my cycle, so that we can time it.

But the other option is IVF, another traumatic experience and the issue I have here is timing. The waiting list is 3 years, meaning I would be 35 before having my first child, all going well. I just don’t know if I can wait that long when it is something I desperately want now. They have suggested we could also go to a neighbouring country where the wait list is 6 months but we must pay €15k–which is a lot of money.

I’m so scared something will happen my partner again so 3 years seems like a lifetime. But I also don’t know if I can live with giving my child a genetic disorder or possibly a death sentence with ACT II. PKD is much more common and therefore I feel ‘manageable’, this is the lesser evil.

Apologies this has been such a long note, Im struggling with this so much and there is only so much I can discuss this with my partner. I havent yet told anyone else we are trying to conceive so I feel very alone in the process. I don’t know what to and would love any advice.

We are both due to get fertility tests done in the next 3 weeks (to make sure IVF is even an option), so I suppose this is the first step.

OP posts:
Phoenix2021 · 28/05/2021 10:44

This is an incredibly tough situation for both you and your partner. In your position if you and your partner as 100% set on children being biologically his , then I would go for the IVF. The psychological trauma associated with either bringing a child into the world with these genetic conditions or having an abortion cannot be underestimated and may damage both your mental health and your relationship, there is no way of predicting until you are faced with the situation directly. The other option which can be very difficult to consider is a sperm donor, this wouldn't be expensive like ivf, as you could do a less costly and invasive procedures. But this is a good option for many even without genetic disorders involved.

Twinmammaplusone · 28/05/2021 10:57

Hi @ellerdn I have personal experience of the same situation so hope I can help.
Dd1 was conceived naturally and born with an extremely rare genetic condition. She needed 24/7 care and died when she was one. It was so rare there are no other known cases in the world AND can’t be tested for (it is undiagnosed). That means DH and I could both be carriers, although unlikely and like you, have been told the chances are 1 in millions of that being the case.
Our options:

  1. conceive naturally and future DC have a 1/4 chance of having it (worst case scenario)
  2. ivf with donor sperm or eggs (geneticists think if we are carriers it is recessive, so would need both of us for the condition to appear in DC, removing one of us and using a donor would remove this risk)
  3. adoption

We decided on 2) because I couldn’t bare the heartache of having another severely ill child. As it happens, I fell pregnant naturally whilst waiting to start ivf and my twins are perfectly healthy. We are hoping to have one more baby and will ttc naturally.

I think it all depends on how severe the illnesses you mention are/ how much they would affect a child’s life. Btw, we started ivf abroad so happy to give you details/ talk pros and cons.

pjani · 28/05/2021 14:05

I feel for you as this sounds so tough. In your shoes I would choose IVF with the genetic testing. Three years is a crazy long time.

It sounds worth spending money on. But do your own research - there might be cheaper??? I haven’t had ivf overseas to know though.

Stay on the local waiting list though.

IsabelHerna · 09/06/2021 10:43

Your situation is increadibly difficult, I am sorry you are going through it and I feel for you. I think I would choose IVF, with genetic testing, but I wouldn't want to wait all this time either!

Do the initial tests, and get on the list, but start doing a research on IVF abroad. Financial reasons are causing me to do the same, but I have a lot of things I am considering and want from my clinic and my doctor. Tests, support, good and friendly coordinators, success rate, good specialised doctors, small or non at all waiting list, low prices, etc (yes I've made a spreadsheet to keep track of everything). I have begining to narrowing it down, to a just a few clinics, they are all amazing and some of them affordable, closer to 3k not 15k!

Do the research darling, and if you need to compate notes, do not hesitate to DM me. Wish you good luck to you and your DH.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread