Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conception

When's the best time to get pregnant? Use our interactive ovulation calculator to work out when you're most fertile and most likely to conceive.

AF or BFN - which is worse?

3 replies

MilkshakeandChips5 · 09/10/2020 11:12

Hi!

We've been TTC for nine months now with not even a sniff of success. I'm currently CD28 and holding out on testing to wait for AF that is due today but dreading it every time I go to the loo.

For distraction, I was thinking which is suckier? Being proactive and doing a test only to get a BFN (but then you know to expect AF) or holding out the hope for AF not to come?

I'm not a tester (mostly because I'm cheap) but think I have some weird addiction to the hope. On the plus side, wine and chocolate when it doesn't happen is one benefit.

OP posts:
GreyishDays · 09/10/2020 11:14

BFN can save you some waiting, but as you’re doing it there’s more of an immediate “this could be positive” in your face. And then a slightly bigger disappointment maybe.

Both suck, in slightly different ways.

bitheby · 09/10/2020 12:23

I'll tell you what is worse ... faint positive and AF comes anyway. I'm not testing early anymore. I don't want the hope that then gets dashed.

Stabal · 09/10/2020 12:41

For me personally, BFN is worse. Still hasn't stopped me testing though 🙄

@bitheby completely agree, that is definitely the worst

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread