[Hopefully below makes more sense, can't seem to edit my previous post to remove nonsense paste, have asked MNHQ to delete so reposting a more sensible version below in the hope that they do!]
Similar experience here. I had an appointment last week after 7-8 months of no periods post pill, had internal scan and had "an enlarged ovary"
Was told it could be "multi-cystic" rather than polycycstic. This seems to mean that it has a lot of follicles throughout but they don't sit in a ring round the outside of the ovary, as is apparently the case in PCO.
Two days later I get my first period. I did think something was amiss this month. EWCM in evidence and some signs of PMS.
Now have to decide whether I will wait and see if November brings more of same or go for hideously invasive test to check for tube blockages. The latter means we can't actively try for the next four weeks due to requiring an x-ray. Not sure how I feel about that.
Questions I tried to ask were:
What do hormone tests mean
I asked questions throughout the scan based on findings
Exercise and body fat (lots and low respectively but not underweight)
I found it really helpful to have written down all of my questions beforehand and take them with me. I don't suppose that there is any such thing as a stupid question in these matters.
Didn't feel like a great hearing instead played out as a rant about NHS referral system - not ideal methinks.