Hi
I had a mc 2.5 years a go and then nothing since. I had a HSG back in Jan this year. We weren't expecting to find problems at my HSG as I have no histoy of PID / STD and screen negative for chlamydia etc. Also no symptoms of endo, plus a previous pregnancy of course (although ended in m/c).
However at the HSG my tubes were found to be damaged which was very surprising. I have been given a mixed and varied account of what could be wrong with the tubes by different Dr's and what may be the treatment required which has caused me a lot of distresss. One Dr wanted to remove my tubes which I could not come to terms with. I know there is something wrong with them, I do accept that as I have 2.5 years of infertility behind me. I have also had 1 failed IVF cycle and 1 failed FET this year - the lap will help to determine if my tubes are interfering with implantation too.
I have finally got a copy of my HSG report and it seems to have contradictions with in it. I just wondered if there was anyone out there who could have a read and pass comment on what might be wrong and the extent of damage and possibility of repair. I am having a lap in January. I know this will give me the final answers but a lot of my anxieties relate to how prepared I should be for very bad news.
"Normal uterine configuration with no filling defects. Preferential right fallopian tube contrast opacification with peritoneal spillage , with distal right fallopian tube minor dilation / partial hydrosalpinx, with marked pooling of contrast at the distal end in keeping with probable peritubular adhesions. Limited opacification if the left fallopian tube which appears unremarkable, with limited left peritoneal spillage."
I don't understand how it is possible to have a hydrosalpinx (blocked tubed) and peritoneal spillage at the same time. I'm also not sure what a partial hydrosalpinx could be. I have done quite a bit of research and have never come accross this.
Any thoughts would be great. Or people with similiar experiences?
Thanks